2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00176-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
129
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane permeate contained 0.3-0.43 mg/l of DOC (96-98% reduction), which were similar results to those obtained by Lynch and Smith [16]. More recently, Cho et al [17] studied the natural organic matter (NOM) rejection using ultrafiltration polyamide thin film composite (TFC) membranes (MWCO=8000 Da) as well as regenerated cellulose membranes (MWCO=3000 Da). It was shown that despite the large pores of UF membranes, the significant fractions of DOC were removed after membrane filtration, however, the degree of DOC removal was strongly affected by feed solution chemistry.…”
Section: Removal Of Bom By Membrane Filtrationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The membrane permeate contained 0.3-0.43 mg/l of DOC (96-98% reduction), which were similar results to those obtained by Lynch and Smith [16]. More recently, Cho et al [17] studied the natural organic matter (NOM) rejection using ultrafiltration polyamide thin film composite (TFC) membranes (MWCO=8000 Da) as well as regenerated cellulose membranes (MWCO=3000 Da). It was shown that despite the large pores of UF membranes, the significant fractions of DOC were removed after membrane filtration, however, the degree of DOC removal was strongly affected by feed solution chemistry.…”
Section: Removal Of Bom By Membrane Filtrationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The occurrence of membrane fouling [3] is an inevitable problem. Membrane flux will gradually decrease with the increase of filtration time, and general clean water can not completely remove the oil drop plug in the membrane hole.…”
Section: Effect Of Recoil Times On Membrane Flux Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that hydrophobic membranes can induce the adsorption of aromatic compounds (e.g. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, humic substances, aromatic pesticides) onto the surface by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions [161][162][163] and this fact has been used for the removal of organic pollutants during water treatment [162] .…”
Section: Sampling and Sample Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%