2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane fouling during the fractionation of phytosterols isolated from orange juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional details concerning the ultrafiltration apparatus and the schematic design of the system can be found in Abd-Razak et al (2019). The ultrafiltration fouling and cleaning cycle consists of membrane conditioning, pure water flux (PWF), filtration, rinsing, and cleaning steps (Abd-Razak et al 2019). Permeate flux was measured during the ultrafiltration of orange juice.…”
Section: Ultrafiltration Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additional details concerning the ultrafiltration apparatus and the schematic design of the system can be found in Abd-Razak et al (2019). The ultrafiltration fouling and cleaning cycle consists of membrane conditioning, pure water flux (PWF), filtration, rinsing, and cleaning steps (Abd-Razak et al 2019). Permeate flux was measured during the ultrafiltration of orange juice.…”
Section: Ultrafiltration Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study was performed using three types of 10-kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes made from regenerated cellulose (RC), polyethersulphone (PES), and fluoropolymer (FP). The 10-kDa regenerated cellulose membrane displayed the best rejection ratio of phytosterols (32%) from proteins in orange juice (Abd-Razak et al 2019). Thus, process optimisation is important since the phytosterol yield was relatively low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in order to choose the right system, some authors have studied the comparison between ceramic and polymeric membranes for different purposes and applications [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Few studies have been carried out using the same membrane cut-off and the same operating conditions [ 39 , 40 ] and none have been applied to agave fructan fractionation. The industry must define the purification and fractionation process for agave fructans and, for these reasons, the objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the operation of ceramic and polymeric membrane systems at the pilot scale in the tight UF process of agave fructans, in terms of their hydraulic permeability, permeate flux, rejection coefficient, fouling resistance and the global yield of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of cellulose-based pressure-driven membrane filtration has been extensively described in literature [1][2][3][4][5]. Despite the chosen method of describing cellulose as a polymer-regardless of whether it is recognised as hydrophilic or an amphiphilic one [5][6][7][8][9]-the regenerated cellulose membranes are universally acknowledged as very hydrophilic, having higher biocompatibility and lower fouling tendency when compared with petroleum-based polymers due to cellulose being a biopolymer [10][11][12][13]. The existing research focusing on the manufacturing of cellulose membranes is highly variable regarding whether research groups prefer to use commercially produced cellulose [14][15][16] or biobased cellulose sources [2,17,18], using various solvents with high capacity for cellulose dissolution [3,4,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%