Nascent membrane proteins typically insert in a sequential fashion into the membrane via a protein-conducting channel, the Sec translocon. How this process occurs is still unclear, although a thermodynamic partitioning between the channel and the membrane environment has been proposed. Experiment-and simulationbased scales for the insertion free energy of various amino acids are, however, at variance, the former appearing to lie in a narrower range than the latter. Membrane insertion of arginine, for instance, requires 14-17 kcal∕mol according to molecular dynamics simulations, but only 2-3 kcal∕mol according to experiment. We suggest that this disagreement is resolved by assuming a two-stage insertion process wherein the first step, the insertion into the translocon, is energized by protein synthesis and, therefore, has an effectively zero free-energy cost; the second step, the insertion into the membrane, invokes the translocon as an intermediary between the fully hydrated and the fully inserted locations. Using free-energy perturbation calculations, the effective transfer free energies from the translocon to the membrane have been determined for both arginine and leucine amino acids carried by a background polyleucine helix. Indeed, the insertion penalty for arginine as well as the insertion gain for leucine from the translocon to the membrane is found to be significantly reduced compared to direct insertion from water, resulting in the same compression as observed in the experiment-based scale.membrane-protein insertion | SecY | ribosome | hydrophobicity scale N early all membrane proteins found in the inner membranes of bacterial cells and the membranes of eukaryotic cells are inserted concomitant with their synthesis by the ribosome, i.e., cotranslationally (1). Insertion into the bilayer does not happen directly, but rather occurs via a highly conserved protein-conducting channel in the membrane, the Sec translocon (2-4). At an early stage of synthesis, the ribosome docks to the channel, forming a tightly bound complex (5, 6). The polypeptide is then inserted into the translocon prior to entering the membrane, the former step requiring a driving force, such as nucleotide hydrolysis, a membrane potential gradient, or the pressure exerted by the growing nascent chain (2).In addition to aiding the insertion of membrane proteins, the translocon also allows certain nascent proteins to cross the membrane (2). Structures of the Sec translocon (7-9) reveal two apparent gates, one transverse for the passage of soluble proteins across the membrane and one lateral for the exit of membrane proteins (7,10,11). The lateral gate is formed at the interface of two halves of SecY (7, 12) (see Fig. 1B). This gate fluctuates during translocation of the nascent polypeptide (13,14), although what factors govern its opening and closing are unclear (8,9,15).Given the two pathways presented by the translocon, there must exist a way to discriminate between proteins destined for the lipid membrane environment and proteins destined ...