1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)80683-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane pore characterization—comparison between single and multicomponent solute probe techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the MWCO (90% PEG rejection) of the membranes shifted from 80 kDa to 100 kDa as ZIF-L loading was increased from 0.25% to 1.0%. The MWCO of 80 kDa and 100 kDa corresponded to pore size of 14.8 nm and 16.5 nm, respectively [28]. The increase in pore size contributed to the higher flux of the modified membrane.…”
Section: Molecular Weight Cut-off (Mwco)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that the MWCO (90% PEG rejection) of the membranes shifted from 80 kDa to 100 kDa as ZIF-L loading was increased from 0.25% to 1.0%. The MWCO of 80 kDa and 100 kDa corresponded to pore size of 14.8 nm and 16.5 nm, respectively [28]. The increase in pore size contributed to the higher flux of the modified membrane.…”
Section: Molecular Weight Cut-off (Mwco)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The surface morphology and roughness of the membranes were characterized by AFM , where d is the pore diameter (nm) [28].…”
Section: Characterization Of Zif-l Nanoflakes and Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We favor this method over using solutions containing a solute mixture to obtain a molecular weight cut-off curve for the membrane. It has been demonstrated that the use of mixtures tends to underestimate the molecular cut-off and the pore size of the membrane due to solute±solute interferences that occur during the passage of the mixed solutes through the membrane pores [21,22]. Polyethylene glycols (PEG, Fluka) were chosen as probe solutes since they are water soluble and can be readily obtained commercially with narrow molar mass distributions.…”
Section: Determination Of Permeability and Cut-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flux losses during UF occur through various mechanisms including: adsorption, steric hindrance, pore plugging and concentration polarization or gel layer formation [1,2]. These contributions have been modelled phenomenologically using series resistance (SR) models [3] or combined osmotic pressure-adsorption (OPA) models [1].…”
Section: Flux Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%