Membrane Proteins Production for Structural Analysis 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0662-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane Protein Production for Structural Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A nonionic detergent n-Dodecyl-B-D-Maltopyranoside (DDM), being a “standard” class of its own as it is one of the most commonly used compounds in membrane protein purification. A 2,2-didecylpropane-1,3-bis-β-D-maltopyranoside (LMNG), another nonionic detergent with branched-chains, which is reported to form more stable protein-detergent complex and stabilizes the protein itself [ 63 ]. From the second zwitterionic class, Fos-Choline-12 (FC12), with strong extraction capabilities and n-Dodecyl-N,N-Dimethylamine-N-Oxide (LDAO) as one of the most successful of the zwitterionic detergents [ 64 ] were selected, see Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonionic detergent n-Dodecyl-B-D-Maltopyranoside (DDM), being a “standard” class of its own as it is one of the most commonly used compounds in membrane protein purification. A 2,2-didecylpropane-1,3-bis-β-D-maltopyranoside (LMNG), another nonionic detergent with branched-chains, which is reported to form more stable protein-detergent complex and stabilizes the protein itself [ 63 ]. From the second zwitterionic class, Fos-Choline-12 (FC12), with strong extraction capabilities and n-Dodecyl-N,N-Dimethylamine-N-Oxide (LDAO) as one of the most successful of the zwitterionic detergents [ 64 ] were selected, see Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane proteins continue to be a challenge to work with. This is especially true when trying to produce them for structural characterization, which often necessitates over‐expressing and producing them recombinantly using model microbial systems, namely E. coli and yeast‐based systems (Bian et al, 2012; Mus, 2014; O'Malley et al, 2006; Pines & Inouye, 1999; Routledge et al, 2016; Saida et al, 2006). Even under successful conditions, there are still concerns about structural integrity and post‐translational processing that must be considered before attempting to interpret structural data and deduce important insights, which might otherwise be questionable (Haines & Irvine, 2003; Oueslati et al, 2010; Snider & Omary, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, ainda que simples do ponto de vista de preparo para a simulação, essa técnica é muito dispendiosa computacionalmente, por requerer longo, por vezes impraticável, tempo de trajetória e amostragem da flutuação da estrutura ligantes, assim como do receptor, de tal forma a observar eventos de ligação e dissociação do sítio de interação e obter uma correta amostragem. [74] Por outro lado, uma grande vantagem da técnica é permitir acompanhar o caminho de acesso à cavidade em detalhes, bem como a influência de outras moléculas do ligante e, até mesmo, a interação concomitante de um ou mais ligantes ao mesmo sítio de interação.…”
Section: Docking Molecularunclassified