1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(98)00189-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane technologies for remediating contaminated soils: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The not high efficiency of the biological treatment generally observed may be ascribed to the scarce occurrence of chloroaniline and chlorobenzene degrading bacteria in the effluents and to the high recalcitrance of the pollutants (Nishino et al, 1994;Sutherland et al, 1995;Alexander, 1999;Samanta et al, 2002;Wenderoth et al, 2003). Thus, other treatment approaches, such as those exploiting the Fenton oxidation of pollutants (Saxe et al, 2000) or the pollutant removal with specific membranes (Sikdar et al, 1998), would have to be considered for the decontamination of the wastewaters resulting from the washing of the highly contaminated soil of the ACNA site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The not high efficiency of the biological treatment generally observed may be ascribed to the scarce occurrence of chloroaniline and chlorobenzene degrading bacteria in the effluents and to the high recalcitrance of the pollutants (Nishino et al, 1994;Sutherland et al, 1995;Alexander, 1999;Samanta et al, 2002;Wenderoth et al, 2003). Thus, other treatment approaches, such as those exploiting the Fenton oxidation of pollutants (Saxe et al, 2000) or the pollutant removal with specific membranes (Sikdar et al, 1998), would have to be considered for the decontamination of the wastewaters resulting from the washing of the highly contaminated soil of the ACNA site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, conventional bioremediation techniques are usually ineffective. A feasible, effective, and inexpensive alternative for cleaning up such soils and sites might be a surfactant-aided ex situ soil washing technology (Gotlieb et al, 1993;Cheah et al, 1998;Sikdar et al, 1998;Deshpande et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these techniques, however, are more expensive and cumbersome than filtration method. The filtration methods, such as microfiltration and ultrafiltration have been widely used for separating fine particles, colloids, and microbes for basic chemicals and synthetic fertilizers, environmental protection and waste water treatment, and the food industry, as well as others [19][20][21][22]. The efficiency of membrane filtration is dependent on the particle size, membrane pore size, and pressure, which are major factors affecting the solid/liquid separation because the flow resistance increases with decreasing particle and membrane pore sizes [19,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…전 세계적으로 비소와 중금속에 의한 토양 오염의 심각 성이 지속적으로 보고되고 있으며 그 오염 피해가 발생하고 있다 Smith et al, 1998) 식물정화 (phytoremediation) 등이 제시되고 있다 (Sikdar et al, 1998). 대상 오염 토양이 농경지일 경우 복원 후 식 물 생육이 가능해야 한다는 특수성을 고려할 때 여러 복원 방법들 중에서 안정화 공법이 적합하다고 인식되고 있다 (Kim et al, 2010 (Table 2).…”
Section: 서 언unclassified