2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memetic algorithm with simulated annealing strategy and tightness greedy optimization for community detection in networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This area just spotlights on four agent models that are ordinarily utilized in the IM issue, to be specific Independent Cascade (IC) demonstrate, Linear Threshold (LT) show, Triggering (TR) model, and Time Aware model. We likewise quickly examine regular non-dynamic dissemination models [22]. Powerful Node Tracking on Dynamic Social Network: An Interchange Greedy Approach: In this paper we tend to explore a unique downside, particularly appropriate Node seek after disadvantage, as A growth of Influence Maximization disadvantage to dynamic frameworks [23].…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area just spotlights on four agent models that are ordinarily utilized in the IM issue, to be specific Independent Cascade (IC) demonstrate, Linear Threshold (LT) show, Triggering (TR) model, and Time Aware model. We likewise quickly examine regular non-dynamic dissemination models [22]. Powerful Node Tracking on Dynamic Social Network: An Interchange Greedy Approach: In this paper we tend to explore a unique downside, particularly appropriate Node seek after disadvantage, as A growth of Influence Maximization disadvantage to dynamic frameworks [23].…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, some attempts tried to show that community structures are one of the significant characteristics in the most complex networks such as social networks due to numerous trends of human being to forming groups or communities. Due to the significant applications of community detection, several community detection approaches have been presented in literature which can be classified into six categories: spectral and clustering methods [20], [21], [15], [22], hierarchical algorithms [23], modularity-based methods [24], [25], evolutionary modelbased methods [26], [27], local community detection methods, and feature-based assisted methods [11]. Along with that total sixteen articles (published in 2015 to 2017) presented in this survey are summarized in Table 1 that contains eight columns.…”
Section: Community Detection Over Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai-hong mu et al [24] present a graph based greedy optimized community detection approach that use memetic algorithm (ma) based on genetic algorithm to compute local structural information of networks to improve the diversity of the population but increase computational cost. Xu Zhou [25] proposed an optimized Biogeography based Community detection approach over dynamic network.…”
Section: Community Detection Over Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA telah digunakan untuk permasalahan optimasi kombinatorial. SA merupakan metode dengan pendekatan pencarian solusi yang random (Mu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified