2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4931181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memetic algorithms for ligand expulsion from protein cavities

Abstract: Ligand diffusion through a protein interior is a fundamental process governing biological signaling and enzymatic catalysis. A complex topology of channels in proteins leads often to difficulties in modeling ligand escape pathways by classical molecular dynamics simulations. In this paper two novel memetic methods for searching the exit paths and cavity space exploration are proposed: Memory Enhanced Random Acceleration (MERA) Molecular Dynamics and Immune Algorithm (IA). In MERA, a pheromone concept is introd… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RPs of the hupA dissociation were computed using MS, an enhanced-sampling method to probe ligand dissociation from the active site of an enzyme to solvent. 21,24 The method constructs all possible heterogeneous RPs along transient tunnels without initial guesses of intermediate or final states, requiring only crystallographic information. An initial guess of the trajectory R(t) joining R A and R B (Figure 1) was determined by minimizing the effective interaction energy Λ between hupA and the enzyme…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RPs of the hupA dissociation were computed using MS, an enhanced-sampling method to probe ligand dissociation from the active site of an enzyme to solvent. 21,24 The method constructs all possible heterogeneous RPs along transient tunnels without initial guesses of intermediate or final states, requiring only crystallographic information. An initial guess of the trajectory R(t) joining R A and R B (Figure 1) was determined by minimizing the effective interaction energy Λ between hupA and the enzyme…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, as the ligand did not egress during unbiased MD, we evaluated whether modified RAMD could be useful to explore the effect the GluN2B‐E413G and other mutations on ligand egress. During channel‐exploration MD, it is normal to adjust the amount of acceleration on the ligand to a value that is appropriate for the ligand and protein . This was also the case for glutamate egress from GluN2B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with SMD, RaMD requires no predefinition of ligand dissociation pathway and thus enables detecting alternative ligand release pathway. However, careful selections of the force magnitude and threshold distance that are used to determine whether the force direction should be changed, are still needed [108]. Improper selection of force might lead to unexpected conformational changes in protein structure, and specific parameters should be set for different biomolecules [109−111].…”
Section: Random Acceleration Molecular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%