2007
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701518649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory-Altering Drugs: Shifting the Paradigm of Informed Consent

Abstract: and such a deliberation can be meaningful only if we take into account the complexity of the issues at stake.In sum, the issues of physical and psychological harm and of commercial exploitation are important, but they are hardly the only normative issues raised by the use of MMTs. None of these issues can be resolved without a broader examination of the importance of memory and the risks of its deliberate modification. As we have suggested, the inappropriate use of MMTs can deny access to important truths, red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Propranolol has been administered to individuals immediately after experiencing a traumatic event (Pitman et al 2002), and also to PTSD patients immediately after they recall traumatic memories (Brunet et al 2008), blocking the emotional response to the memory and, in both studies, leading to decreased emotional responsivity during subsequent recollections. Although promising, this treatment has initiated heated debate regarding the legal and ethical issues associated with “memory dampening,” as it has been called (Kolber 2006; Tenenbaum & Reese 2007).…”
Section: Memory Reconsolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propranolol has been administered to individuals immediately after experiencing a traumatic event (Pitman et al 2002), and also to PTSD patients immediately after they recall traumatic memories (Brunet et al 2008), blocking the emotional response to the memory and, in both studies, leading to decreased emotional responsivity during subsequent recollections. Although promising, this treatment has initiated heated debate regarding the legal and ethical issues associated with “memory dampening,” as it has been called (Kolber 2006; Tenenbaum & Reese 2007).…”
Section: Memory Reconsolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been suggested that the blunted affect of a rape victim who was administered prophylactic medication in the emergency room may lead a jury to find the person's testimony unconvincing, thus weakening the case against the perpetrator in court [52]. In discussing the pros and cons of chemoprophylaxis in the context of providing such testimony, it must once again be remembered that the purpose of this intervention is to prevent PTSD.…”
Section: Legal Ramificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further complicated by the need to obtain informed consent from an individual who has very recently experienced a traumatic event. Tenenbaum and Reese (2007) further assert that the use of memory-attenuating drugs under such circumstances calls for informed consent to be expanded to encompass awareness that such treatment may mean the patient would be ineffective in aiding a criminal investigation, advocating for social change, or bearing witness in a legal trial. This call for a high threshold of informed consent speaks to the fundamental imperative to respect a patient's autonomy.…”
Section: Informed Consent and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 98%