2004
DOI: 10.1353/cdr.2004.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory, Composition, and the Relationship of King John to The Troublesome Raigne of King John

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the company's repertoire, which included The Troublesome Reign; 1 however, there have been relatively few significant scholarly articles on the play in the past decade, except for those by Beatrice Groves, Richard Helgerson, Brian Vickers, and Forker himself. 2 Most of these and earlier discussions focus upon the play's oft-disputed authorship, date, and textual relationship to Shakespeare's King John as much as its merit as a stand-alone dramatic work. Forker's comprehensive introduction is no exception to this trend, as it includes a section on the relationship between The Troublesome Reign and King John (also a major focus of the commentary); but he also performs careful analysis of the play's ceremonial spectacle, ideological ambiguity, political symbolism, and many other thematic aspects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the company's repertoire, which included The Troublesome Reign; 1 however, there have been relatively few significant scholarly articles on the play in the past decade, except for those by Beatrice Groves, Richard Helgerson, Brian Vickers, and Forker himself. 2 Most of these and earlier discussions focus upon the play's oft-disputed authorship, date, and textual relationship to Shakespeare's King John as much as its merit as a stand-alone dramatic work. Forker's comprehensive introduction is no exception to this trend, as it includes a section on the relationship between The Troublesome Reign and King John (also a major focus of the commentary); but he also performs careful analysis of the play's ceremonial spectacle, ideological ambiguity, political symbolism, and many other thematic aspects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%