2006
DOI: 10.1159/000093839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory for Choices in Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract: Despite their cognitive impairment, patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) often make important life choices. When making choices, people frequently attempt to directly compare the features of different options, rather than evaluating each option separately. Not every feature has an analogous (or alignable) feature in the other option, however. In 2005, Mather’s group found that both younger and older adults filled in such gaps when remembering, creating features in the other option to contrast with exist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of alignability on decision making or memory have been investigated in a number of studies (e.g., Markman and Medin, 1995 ; Markman and Gentner, 1997 ; Mather et al, 2005 ), and the degree of alignability varies across the studies we reviewed. All attributes of the options in Svenson et al (2009) , Queen and Hess (2010) and DeKay et al (2014) were alignable, whereas others employed a design where half of the attributes were alignable and the other half unalignable ( Budson et al, 2006 ; Hess et al, 2012 ). The remaining studies did not specifically assess the importance of alignability and did not specify the alignability of the attributes.…”
Section: Factors Potentially Influencing Memory Choice-supportivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of alignability on decision making or memory have been investigated in a number of studies (e.g., Markman and Medin, 1995 ; Markman and Gentner, 1997 ; Mather et al, 2005 ), and the degree of alignability varies across the studies we reviewed. All attributes of the options in Svenson et al (2009) , Queen and Hess (2010) and DeKay et al (2014) were alignable, whereas others employed a design where half of the attributes were alignable and the other half unalignable ( Budson et al, 2006 ; Hess et al, 2012 ). The remaining studies did not specifically assess the importance of alignability and did not specify the alignability of the attributes.…”
Section: Factors Potentially Influencing Memory Choice-supportivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, they observed greater choice-supportiveness for alignable attributes. This suggests that the effect can be greater for alignable features, at least in some populations (see also Mather et al, 2005 ; Budson et al, 2006 ), and that this difference can be related to cognitive skills. However, more studies are needed to fully clarify the role of alignability in choice-supportive misremembering, especially in relation to the category of false memories and in different populations.…”
Section: Factors Potentially Influencing Memory Choice-supportivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…spatial information), while sparing source-specifying features that are more automatically processed. In fact, older adults with AD have increased difficulties in tasks that reflect frontal functioning and therefore should be particularly affected in SM tasks that strongly rely on control processes (Budson et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%