Abstract:Two emotional dimensions (evaluation, activation) were used along with serial position, word frequency, word length, and word order as independent variables in a serial list recall task with 36 words ( N = 30 subjects). All variables were significantly related to recall in some fashion. Pleasant or unpleasant, active, short, common words in a primary or recency position were best recalled. Serial position was associated with the strongest significant main effect (η = .41), while activation, order, frequency, a… Show more
“…This benefit cannot be explained by a guessing bias (Experiment 3) or by priming effects (Experiments 3 and 4). The recall advantage for affect-laden material corroborates previous data obtained with longer visual exposures (Bradley & Lang, 2000;Bradley et al, 1992;Lamarche et al, 1993;Maltzman et al, 1966;Paul & Whissell, 1992). In the present circumstances, this recall advantage reinforces the idea that the emotional load facilitated token individuation (Chun, 1997).…”
“…This benefit cannot be explained by a guessing bias (Experiment 3) or by priming effects (Experiments 3 and 4). The recall advantage for affect-laden material corroborates previous data obtained with longer visual exposures (Bradley & Lang, 2000;Bradley et al, 1992;Lamarche et al, 1993;Maltzman et al, 1966;Paul & Whissell, 1992). In the present circumstances, this recall advantage reinforces the idea that the emotional load facilitated token individuation (Chun, 1997).…”
Results from subject-wise and word-wise analyses of recall for four types of emotional lists memorized by 14 subjects confirm that active words (pleasant and active, unpleasant and active) are better recalled than passive words (pleasant and passive, unpleasant and passive). The standardized formula 'recall = .68 (serial position) + .24 (activation)' successfully predicts 53% (R = .73) of variance in the recall criterion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.