2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704811104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory in receptor–ligand-mediated cell adhesion

Abstract: Single-molecule biomechanical measurements, such as the force to unfold a protein domain or the lifetime of a receptor-ligand bond, are inherently stochastic, thereby requiring a large number of data for statistical analysis. Sequentially repeated tests are generally used to obtain a data ensemble, implicitly assuming that the test sequence consists of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables, i.e., a Bernoulli sequence. We tested this assumption by using data from the micropipette adh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests cooperativity in binding between TCRs, which could be achieved by their organization in TCR oligomers in protein islands. Micropipette adhesion frequency assays used to measure TCR-MHCp interactions showed not only a similar increase in TCR-MHCp on rate (Huang et al, 2010), but also showed that interaction events clustered in time, meaning that the probability of interaction was higher when an interaction had occurred in the immediately previous cycle of this assay (Zarnitsyna et al, 2007). One possible explanation for this effect could be that such clusters of interaction represent sequential interaction of the individual TCRs complexes within a TCR oligomer with the single MHCp ligand on the opposing membrane.…”
Section: + Cd8 + Memory T Cells (Black Lines) and Cd8 + T Cells From mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This suggests cooperativity in binding between TCRs, which could be achieved by their organization in TCR oligomers in protein islands. Micropipette adhesion frequency assays used to measure TCR-MHCp interactions showed not only a similar increase in TCR-MHCp on rate (Huang et al, 2010), but also showed that interaction events clustered in time, meaning that the probability of interaction was higher when an interaction had occurred in the immediately previous cycle of this assay (Zarnitsyna et al, 2007). One possible explanation for this effect could be that such clusters of interaction represent sequential interaction of the individual TCRs complexes within a TCR oligomer with the single MHCp ligand on the opposing membrane.…”
Section: + Cd8 + Memory T Cells (Black Lines) and Cd8 + T Cells From mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the concept of kinetic rate memory has been used by different authors to describe different phenomena, which are also different from the one reported here. Previously, we have reported a form of memory in receptor-ligand interaction where the likelihood of bond formation in the next contact is affected by the outcome of the previous contact (44). Lu et al (45) showed that enzymatic turnover of cholesterol oxidase was dependent on previous turnovers, a non-Markovian molecular memory attributed to a slow fluctuation of protein conformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S4A). This demonstrates that when delay times are used between sequential adhesion cycles, the cell adhesion shows no memory of previous adhesion events (Zarnitsyna et al, 2007;Friedrichs et al, 2010;Dao et al, 2013). Therefore, repetitive cell adhesion measurements were treated as uncorrelated events.…”
Section: Adhesion Time and Cytoskeletal Linking Modulate Alcam-mediatmentioning
confidence: 99%