Memory performance following napping in habitual and non-habitual nappers

Abstract

Study Objectives Afternoon naps benefit memory but this may depend on whether one is a habitual napper (HN; ≥1 nap/week) or non-habitual napper (NN). Here, we investigated whether a nap would benefit HN and NN differently, as well as whether HN would be more adversely affected by nap restriction compared to NN. Methods Forty-six participants in the nap condition (HN-nap: n = 25, NN-nap: n = 21) took a 90-min nap (14:00–15:30 pm) on experimental days while 46 participants in the Wake condition (HN-wake: n = 24, NN-wake: n = 22) remained awake in the afternoon. Memory tasks were administered after the nap to assess short-term topographical memory and long-term memory in the form of picture encoding and factual knowledge learning respectively. Results An afternoon nap boosted picture encoding and factual knowledge learning irrespective of whether one habitually napped (main effects of condition (nap/wake): ps < 0.037). However, we found a significant interaction for the hippocampal-dependent topographical memory task (p = 0.039) wherein a nap, relative to wake, benefitted habitual nappers (HN-nap vs HN-wake: p = 0.003) compared to non-habitual nappers (NN-nap vs. NN-wake: p = 0.918). Notably for this task, habitual nappers’ performance significantly declined if they were not allowed to nap (HN-wake vs NN-wake: p = 0.037). Conclusions Contrary to concerns that napping may be disadvantageous for non-habitual nappers, we found that an afternoon nap was beneficial for long-term memory tasks even if one did not habitually nap. Naps were especially beneficial for habitual nappers performing a short-term topographical memory task, as it restored the decline that would otherwise have been incurred without a nap. Clinical Trial Information NCT04044885.

Does Bright Light Counteract the Post-lunch Dip in Subjective States and Cognitive Performance Among Undergraduate Students?

“…In some countries, such as in China, most university students are used to take a short post-lunch nap during working days. Multiple empirical studies have demonstrated that people taking a brief nap (20-40 min) would promote afternoon function including vigilance, sustained attention, executive functions, logic reasoning, memory, and learning performance (5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), whereas a lost opportunity of midday nap would lead to various impaired effects on alertness, mood, and performance ability, especially for those who habitually takes a nap (7,(9)(10)(11).…”

Association Between Nap Duration and Cognitive Functions Among Saudi Older Adults

“…A large Chinese study of approximately 11,000 elderly participants observed a 34% increase in odds of cognitive impairment among short nappers and towfolds increase in risk of cognitive deterioration among nappers of long duration (Lin et al, 2018). These cognitive benefits of moderate napping seems to benefit both habitual and non-habitual nappers (Leong et al, 2021).…”

A sleep schedule incorporating naps benefits the transformation of hierarchical knowledge

“…Slow spindles are more commonly seen in frontal areas and are associated with general cognitive abilities and learning efficiency [ 33 ], whereas fast spindles are seen in centroparietal areas and associated with complex cognitive abilities such as fluid intelligence [ 34 ]. The (~9–12 Hz), and (~12–15 Hz) criteria for the spindle classification was based on the Mölle algorithm used for automatic spindle detection [ 31 ] and has been used in prior studies involving adolescents [ 35 , 36 ]. Following procedures described previously [ 37 ], spindle count and density (counts per minute) were obtained for both N2 and N3 sleep stages.…”