2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory reconsolidation and the crisis of mechanism in psychotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Ecker (2015) suggests, emotions felt by the participant during a session were used as cues for successful EM reactivation. Other than being a cue to confirm EM reactivation, VDR also seemed to stimulate emotional arousal for many participants (P6–S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Ecker (2015) suggests, emotions felt by the participant during a session were used as cues for successful EM reactivation. Other than being a cue to confirm EM reactivation, VDR also seemed to stimulate emotional arousal for many participants (P6–S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy remains about the specific role of emotion in the reconsolidation process. Ecker (2015) states that regarding EM reconsolidation in psychotherapy, emotional arousal serves as “a key marker of adequate reactivation” (p. 135). However, Lane et al (2015) propose that it holds a more important role in this process, capitalizing on the evidence that emotional arousal is a predictor of psychotherapeutic success and on the assumption that reconsolidation theory explains the neurobiological mechanisms of enduring change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we proceed further to examine the range of variations in how that general form can be carried out, producing significantly different types and degrees of enduring change. On this point, Ecker and Vaz (2022, p. 4) have explained:Thus, by itself the term “memory reconsolidation” denotes not a particular type or degree of change, but rather the fundamental mechanism that destabilizes and then restabilizes (deconsolidates and then reconsolidates) the encoding of a target learning. That deconsolidation/reconsolidation process allows a target learning to be re-encoded and updated but does not in itself cause a target learning to be changed.…”
Section: The Core Change Universe: Memory Change Via Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the 13 cases contain long-term confirmation of ongoing symptom cessation and schema nullification without relapse, which is the strongest marker of unlearning via MR, but a few lack such follow-up verification. Ecker and Vaz (2022) have described the design of a planned study for carrying out that same type of detection in a methodologically sound manner, in order to put the demonstration on solid ground empirically. The hypothesis of this planned study was first defined by Ecker et al (2012): Whenever any therapy client begins to report the unambiguous markers of transformational change, that always is the prompt result of the unlearning process of MR having been fulfilled just previously, whether knowingly or unknowingly.…”
Section: The Core Change Universe: Memory Change Via Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both frameworks also require that the interventionpharmacological or psychotherapeuticis followed by the new learning of a preferred behaviour different from the maladaptive one, i.e., counteractive learning. Unfortunately, this process creates a secondary belief (new behaviour) that competes with the existing maladaptive one, with the risk of relapse and/or a limited degree of symptom relief (Ecker & Vaz, 2022). As noted by different authors (Langkaas et al, 2018;Ecker & Vaz, 2022) mild, partial, incremental change has been the typical outcome in psychiatry and psychotherapy, both in general and in the treatment of AN (Zeeck et al, 2018).…”
Section: Implications For Treatment and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%