2018
DOI: 10.31273/eirj.v5i2.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory Studies Goes Planetary: An Interview with Stef Craps

Abstract: Stef Craps is Associate Professor of English Literature at Ghent University, where he directs the Cultural Memory Studies Initiative (CMSI). He is an internationally recognised scholar whose research focuses on postcolonial literatures, trauma theory, transcultural Holocaust memory, and, more recently, climate change fiction. He has published widely on these issues, including in the seminal Postcolonial Witnessing: Trauma Out of Bounds (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013). He visited Warwick to deliver a public lecture … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is demonstrated in a lively exchange stimulated by a paradigm article by Bryan Cheyette (2017), in which leading scholars explore what Nils Roemer calls 'the intersectionality of Jewish and postcolonial studies', premised on '[p]lurality instead of singularity ' (2018: 124). Both of these fields deal with memory, and therefore bringing them into dialogue with the burgeoning field of memory studies -closely related to trauma studies and Holocaust studies -is a productive exercise (Roca Lizarazu & Vince, 2018). Perhaps it is a helpful analogy to think of these fields -postcolonial studies, Jewish studies, memory studies, trauma studies -as not fenced in or enclosed but open, wild, 'ill-disciplined' fields with unclear boundary lines (Cheyette, 2009: 1-2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is demonstrated in a lively exchange stimulated by a paradigm article by Bryan Cheyette (2017), in which leading scholars explore what Nils Roemer calls 'the intersectionality of Jewish and postcolonial studies', premised on '[p]lurality instead of singularity ' (2018: 124). Both of these fields deal with memory, and therefore bringing them into dialogue with the burgeoning field of memory studies -closely related to trauma studies and Holocaust studies -is a productive exercise (Roca Lizarazu & Vince, 2018). Perhaps it is a helpful analogy to think of these fields -postcolonial studies, Jewish studies, memory studies, trauma studies -as not fenced in or enclosed but open, wild, 'ill-disciplined' fields with unclear boundary lines (Cheyette, 2009: 1-2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%