Memory training (MT) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) generates change in cognitive performance

Olchik, Maira Rozenfeld; Farina, Jeanette; Steibel, Nicole Maineri; Teixeira, Adriane Ribeiro; Yassuda, Mônica Sanches

doi:10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.007

Cited by 72 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One is that on virtually every CLQT and informal measure, an average (mean) upward trend was noted in participant performance from pre to post training, and furthermore, performance levels were maintained for a several weeks after training. Whereas relatively small effect sizes were yielded for many training gains, upon examination of the adult CT research literature, it becomes apparent that relatively small effect sizes are not unique [28]. Consistent with other studies [29] was the fact that more significant pre-post training differences, and higher effect sizes were revealed for targeted cognitive tasks (i.e., informal measures) than for formal test composites (i.e., CLQT) by group trained participants.…”

Section: Overall Cognitive Training Effectivenesssupporting

confidence: 56%

Memory and Cognitive Prevention Training for Typically Aging Seniors in a University Clinic Setting: A Feasibility Study

Kouri¹

2017

J Speech Pathol Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: While diagnosis and treatment are the major focus for SLPs, professional roles are expanding to include preventative related services with the elderly. Evidence exists as to the effects of preventative cognitive training (CT), yet few studies have examined viable models for SLP implementation. The purpose of this feasibility study was to compare group and individual CT programs delivered in a university based speech and hearing clinic.Method: Forty-eight adults, between the ages of 68-92 years-old were assigned to individual or group based conditions in which they received sixteen hours of CT, implemented by an SLP and graduate student clinicians. Cognitive, memory, language, visuospatial and other skills were trained. Formal and informal, pre-post and 12-week follow-up measures were administered. Function and Satisfaction surveys were administered to determine participant perceptions of functional outcomes. Results:Participants in both CT conditions demonstrated pre-post training gains, although individually trained seniors made more significant improvements than group trained seniors on specific formal measures. The amount of pre to post gain on all assessment measures was similar between groups. Improvements in test scores were maintained at 12-week follow-up testing intervals by both groups. Survey results indicated high satisfaction with CT, although differences were found in perceptual outcomes between groups.Conclusions: Whereas individual participants yielded more significant effects, the Group condition also represents an effective and efficient model for prevention related services with elderly populations, as demonstrated by pre-post training effects and participant satisfaction responses. Clinical training applications for CT implementation in a university training setting are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Overall Cognitive Training Effectivenesssupporting

confidence: 56%

Memory and Cognitive Prevention Training for Typically Aging Seniors in a University Clinic Setting: A Feasibility Study

Kouri¹

2017

J Speech Pathol Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the relative lack of tests and growing importance of such measures, it is clear that the development of ecologically valid tests would benefit rehabilitation research as well as the general field of Neuropsychology. 5,7,15,16,17,18,24,25,27,30,31,33 12 Narrative memory (other) 3,23,28,30 18,23,26,33, 15,21,22,30,31,33 6 Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) 7,8,16,17,26,27,31,33,34 3,7,23,30,31,36 1,3,4,5,15,28,29,32 1 The ...…”

Section: Methodological Challenge 4: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Rehabilitation of Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Methodological Review and Model for Future Research

Hampstead

Gillis

Stringer

2013

J Int Neuropsychol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several recent reviews have suggested that cognitive rehabilitation may hold promise in the treatment of memory deficits experienced by patients with mild cognitive impairment. In contrast to the previous reviews that mainly focused on outcome, the current review examines key methodological challenges that are critical for designing and interpreting research studies and translating results into clinical practice. Using methodological details from 36 studies, we first examine diagnostic variability and how the use of cutoffs may bias samples toward more severely impaired patients. Second, the strengths and limitations of several common rehabilitative techniques are discussed. Half of the reviewed studies used a multi-technique approach that precludes the causal attribution between any specific technique and subsequent improvement. Third, there is a clear need to examine the dose-response relationship since this information was strikingly absent from most studies. Fourth, outcome measures varied widely and frequently depended on neuropsychological tests with little theoretical justification or ecological relevance. Fifth, we discuss how the variability in each of these other four areas complicates efforts to examine training generalization. Overall, future studies should place greater emphasis on ecologically relevant treatment approaches and outcome measures and we propose a hierarchical model that may aid in this pursuit. (JINS, 2014, 20, 135-151)

show abstract

“…Ten of the studies did not give the specific aim of the group sessions (2,9,10,12,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), but only reported the general aim of improving memory and associated cognitive domains. Four studies (8,11,14,21) explicitly reported the overall aim or focus of the group sessions.…”

Section: Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the seven studies that did provide this information (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), group sizes ranged from 3 (18) to 15 (19).…”

Section: Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 11 studies that included number of sessions within a programme; 6 was the fewest (10,19) and 14 the largest number of sessions (14,16). Four of the 14 studies (9, 12, 13, 15) did not give any indication of the frequency of the group sessions; of those which did include this detail, session frequency was twice weekly for six studies (8,14,(16)(17)(18)21), weekly in three studies (10,11,19) and bi-weekly in one (20). Six studies (8,10,11,13,17,21) did not report the overall duration of the entire group programme, but in studies where this was reported, programme durations ranged from 6 weeks (9, 19) to 6 months (12,20).…”

Section: Dosementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Descriptions of memory rehabilitation group interventions for neurological conditions: a systematic review

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Review methods: Articles were included if the sample were adults with a neurological disorder, the intervention was group-based cognitive rehabilitation for memory problems, and if the study was a randomised controlled trial. Articles were independently screened for inclusion and data extracted by two researchers, with the third researcher arbitrating any disputes.Results: Fourteen studies were included in this review. The reporting of certain aspects of an intervention was found to be poor, particularly in relation to: duration of the programme (6 of 14 studies did not report), the development of the intervention (7 of 14 studies did not discuss), and the content and structure of intervention (7 of the 14 studies did not provide details Review methods: Articles were included if the sample were adults with a neurological disorder, the intervention was group-based cognitive rehabilitation for memory problems, and if the study was a randomised controlled trial. Articles were independently screened for inclusion and data extracted by two researchers, with the third researcher arbitrating any disputes.Results: Fourteen studies were included in this review. The reporting of certain aspects of an intervention was found to be poor, particularly in relation to: duration of the programme (6 of 14 studies did not report), the development of the intervention (7 of 14 studies did not discuss), and the content and structure of intervention (7 of the 14 studies did not provide details).Conclusion: This review found that the overall reporting of memory rehabilitation content and format is poor.Refinement and adaption of pre-existing checklists to capture aspects of cognitive rehabilitation programmes may help authors when reporting complex interventions. A draft checklist is provided that could be refined and validated in further research.

show abstract

Memory training (MT) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) generates change in cognitive performance

Cited by 72 publications

References 25 publications

Memory and Cognitive Prevention Training for Typically Aging Seniors in a University Clinic Setting: A Feasibility Study

Memory and Cognitive Prevention Training for Typically Aging Seniors in a University Clinic Setting: A Feasibility Study

Cognitive Rehabilitation of Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Methodological Review and Model for Future Research

Descriptions of memory rehabilitation group interventions for neurological conditions: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About