Recently, several studies were done on SRAM bitcells at different supply‐voltages; upper, near or lower to threshold voltage. To the best of the author's knowledge, none of them discussed at threshold supply‐voltage with proper subthreshold operations and Nano/Pico power‐dissipations, hence this paper decides to investigate challenges and solutions of designing at VboldDboldD ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}$ = Vboldtboldh ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{t}\mathbf{h}}$, because this voltage will lead to having lower power consumptions. This research applies power‐gating technique to adjust VboldDboldD ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}$ on Vboldtboldh ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{t}\mathbf{h}}$, and also utilises output‐inverter to set Logic 1 at VboldDboldD ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}$. Although ‘power‐gating’ and ‘output‐inverter’ were used in other works, this study renders specific points about them. In fact, the ability of power‐gating technique in adjusting VboldDboldD ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}$ on Vboldtboldh ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{t}\mathbf{h}}$ without any instabilities in bitcell operation was not reported before, as well as, the idea of employing output‐inverter in read path for setting Logic‐1 at VboldDboldD ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}$. It also proposed SNM% as a useful figure‐of‐merit. The goal of this study is not to present new circuits for bitcell, but is to investigate challenges and solutions of working under ‘VboldDboldD=Vboldtboldh ${\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{D}\mathbf{D}}={\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{t}\mathbf{h}}$’ which these solutions can lead to having an optimum bitcell.