1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00287670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Men's friendships, women's friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
1
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hoxby (2000) finds evidence that students have better math performance when they are in classrooms that contain more females. 20 their same sex friends (Boyce, 2004, Ch.4), and have interactions that tend to be more personal in nature and involve more self-disclosure and emotional support (Maccoby, 1990, Wright, 1982. 22 An important policy question is whether certain types of students can receive substantial peer benefits without other students incurring substantial costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hoxby (2000) finds evidence that students have better math performance when they are in classrooms that contain more females. 20 their same sex friends (Boyce, 2004, Ch.4), and have interactions that tend to be more personal in nature and involve more self-disclosure and emotional support (Maccoby, 1990, Wright, 1982. 22 An important policy question is whether certain types of students can receive substantial peer benefits without other students incurring substantial costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rose, 1984;Gouldner and Symons Strong, 1987;Helgeson et al, 1987) have found a similar pattern of avoidance of conflict in friendship (Wright'S 1982 study is an exception in this respect). These implicitly suggest that the process of dissolution in friendship may be rather different from the general model of relationship dissolution proposed by Duck (1982).…”
Section: Maintaining and Ending Friendshipsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Over and over again it has been noted that male and female same-sex friendships vary systematically (Bell, 1981b;Caldwell and Peplau, 1982;Wright, 1982;Duck, 1983;Sherrod, 1989). Researchers have found that Women are particularly likely to have intimate confidants (Kornarovsky, 1967;Booth, 1972;Cozby, 1973;Powers and Bultena, 1976;Bell, 1981b;Wright, 1982;Aries and Johnson, 1983;Derlega and Winstead, 1986); that mutual helpfulness is most central to female friendships, whereas shared activities and similar interests are most central to males (Weiss and Lowenthal, 1975;Aukett et al, 1988) and that females use more non-verbal expressions of affection (Rands and Levinger, 1979).…”
Section: Interest In Women's Friendship: Its Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social support, and particularly the information sharing embedded within it, has long been considered integral to health and wellbeing (Carveth & Gottlieb, 1979;Eckenrode & Gore, 1981;Wellman & Gulia, 1999). Friendship ties are a significant component in the complex behavior that is manifest in the giving and receiving of help, and it is clear that men and women use friends differently during periods of life stress and duress (King & Terrance, 2006;Spencer & Pahl, 2006;Wright, 1982;Wright & Scanlon, 1991). It has also been established that it is not just the receiving of help that is supportive, but also there is a supportive element in knowing help is available even if one chooses not to use it (Antonucci & Jackson, 1990;Short, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%