Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time

Abstract

How common is self-citation in scholarly publication, and does the practice vary by gender? Using novel methods and a data set of 1.5 million research papers in the scholarly database JSTOR published between 1779 and 2011, the authors find that nearly 10 percent of references are self-citations by a paper's authors. The findings also show that between 1779 and 2011, men cited their own papers 56 percent more than did women. In the last two decades of data, men self-cited 70 percent more than women. Women are also more than 10 percentage points more likely than men to not cite their own previous work at all. While these patterns could result from differences in the number of papers that men and women authors have published rather than gender-specific patterns of self-citation behavior, this gender gap in self-citation rates has remained stable over the last 50 years, despite increased representation of women in academia. The authors break down self-citation patterns by academic field and number of authors and comment on potential mechanisms behind these observations. These findings have important implications for scholarly visibility and cumulative advantage in academic careers.

Establishing online mentorship for early career researchers: Lessons from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping International Mentoring Programme

“…While useful for some purposes, "objective" measures of academic success can be problematic in several ways. First, research productivity as measured by bibliometric indicators or grant income can vary a lot between subject areas (Bishop, 2014;Kreiman & Maunsell, 2011) and is complicated by other factors, such as gender (Bonham & Stefan, 2017;Bornmann, Mutz, & Daniel, 2007;King, Bergstrom, Correll, Jacquet, & West, 2017;West, Jacquet, King, Correll, & Bergstrom, 2013), social capital (Li, Liao, & Yen, 2013), and possibly even stochastic fluctuation (Michalska-Smith & Allesina, 2017). In addition, they may be an indicator of volume, but not necessarily of the quality of academic work (Michalska-Smith & Allesina, 2017).…”

Gender disparity in computational biology research publications

“…When looking at research output in the form of publication and impact, the story is complex: Women tend to publish less than men 5 , are underrepresented in the more prestigious first and last author positions, and publish fewer singleauthor papers 6 . Articles authored by women are cited less frequently 5 , which might in part be due to men citing their own work more often than women do 7 . Inferring bias in these studies is difficult, since the cause of the disparity between male and female authorship cannot be readily determined.…”

Gender, Work and Organization: A gender–work–organization analysis

“…Hanmer's presentation at the first international conference on men and masculinity held in Bradford in 1988 under the auspices of the British Sociological Association Theory Group, and then published in 1990 (Hanmer, 1990). So, this is in itself a commentary on gendered citation practices (van den Besselaar & Sandström, 2017; also see King, Bergstrom, Correll, Jacquet, & West, 2017). In the current obsession with publishing in 'high impact' journals, I often mention, especially to doctoral researchers, how publishing in a new journal that seeks to consolidate a scholarly field can be a really good idea.…”