1999
DOI: 10.1038/21557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual cycle alters face preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

23
623
8
21

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 739 publications
(675 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
23
623
8
21
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the modulation of the preference for faces during the menstrual cycle appears to be mediated by progesterone, 68,69 as well as the enhancement of the hypothalamus-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis response to stressors during the luteal phase. 70,71 Our results suggest that progesterone could modulate these processes by increasing the responsiveness of the amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the modulation of the preference for faces during the menstrual cycle appears to be mediated by progesterone, 68,69 as well as the enhancement of the hypothalamus-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis response to stressors during the luteal phase. 70,71 Our results suggest that progesterone could modulate these processes by increasing the responsiveness of the amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous work investigating sexually-dimorphic face preferences (DeBruine et al, 2006;Jones et al, 2007;Welling et al, 2007Welling et al, , 2008Welling et al, , 2013, the present study used prototype-based image transformations in order to objectively manipulate sexual dimorphism of 2D shape in facial images, creating masculinized and feminized images of the same individual that are matched for other variables (e.g., skin color, identity, texture: Rowland & Perrett, 1995). Briefly, prototype images (i.e., an average male face and an average female face) were created by averaging a group of male and a group of female images via widely-used computational methods in face perception studies (e.g., Jones et al, 2005;Penton-Voak et al, 1999;Welling et al, 2007). Once prototypes are established, individual stimuli are created by adding or subtracting a percentage of the differences in position between the prototype images from the corresponding points on a third face (for technical details see Rowland & Perrett, 1995;Tiddeman, Burt, & Perrett, 2001).…”
Section: Experiments 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it has been hypothesized that assortative mating triggered the facial differentiation among populations (Penton-Voak et al, 1999;DeBruine et al, 2010;Little et al, 2011). However, the possibility remains that facial shapes diversified under neutrality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%