2004
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00166.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual cycle phase effects on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle

Abstract: Prepulse inhibition (PPI) represents an attenuation of the startle reflex following the presentation of a weak prepulse at brief intervals prior to the startle eliciting pulse. It has been shown that increases in striatal dopamine levels decrease PPI; because dopamine release is sensitive to estrogen, it is likely that PPI varies across the menstrual cycle. Cross-sectional studies looking at estrogen effects suggest that this may be true. In this study, we compare effects of menstrual phase on PPI in a between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
94
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
94
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our finding in women with PMDD is novel, results from the healthy controls in this study are consistent with those from other laboratories (Swerdlow et al, 1997;Jovanovic et al, 2004). Given the heightened baseline startle and the negative Startle response in women with PMDD CN Epperson et al emotional state of women with PMDD during the luteal phase, our finding that affective modulation of the ASR magnitude is intact and consistent in women with PMDD is intriguing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although our finding in women with PMDD is novel, results from the healthy controls in this study are consistent with those from other laboratories (Swerdlow et al, 1997;Jovanovic et al, 2004). Given the heightened baseline startle and the negative Startle response in women with PMDD CN Epperson et al emotional state of women with PMDD during the luteal phase, our finding that affective modulation of the ASR magnitude is intact and consistent in women with PMDD is intriguing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The first explanation, in line with previous data in humans Jovanovic et al, 2004) as well as rats (Koch, 1998), is that complex hormonal fluctuations over the menstrual cycle are responsible for less PPI in premenopausal young women compared with young men, and no difference in PPI between postmenopausal women and older men. However, the loss of sex difference in PPI when examined in postmenopausal women and older men was due mainly to lower PPI in the aged, relative to young, men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The same phenomenon (ie, less PPI in females than males) has been observed in rats (Koch, 1998;Faraday et al, 1999). Sex differences in PPI are considered to be mediated by fluctuating hormones over the ovarian cycle based on the observations of more PPI in women during the (low estrogen) follicular phase relative to the (high estrogen) luteal phase Jovanovic et al, 2004). There is no specific research examining sex differences in PPF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The discrepancy between the current study and the study of Meincke et al (2004) regarding sensitization might be explained by the difference in subject population: in the current study, only males were included, whereas in the study of Meincke et al (2004) both males and females were included. As there are numerous reports in literature describing a gender difference in both PPI (Swerdlow et al, 1993Jovanovic et al, 2004;Kumari et al, 2004) and/or prepulse facilitation (Aasen et al, 2005), it is not inconceivable that gender differences might also exist in the processes of habituation and sensitization. Another explanation might be the difference in the intensity level of the background noise, which was slightly higher in the current study (70 dB) than in the study of Meincke et al (2004) (65 dB), which might have reduced the sensitization effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%