2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00164-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual patterns and fecundity among non-lactating and lactating cycling women in rural highland Bolivia: implications for contraceptive choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ovarian cycle length in rural Aymara women averaged 29.1 days, which falls within the observed range for sea level [ 13 ]. The proportion of ovulatory cycles, as assessed by progesterone levels, was comparable in a sample of Chicago women and economically advantaged women in La Paz, Bolivia (91 % and 88 % respectively); however, it was far lower (45 %) in the poorer women of La Paz [ 14 ].…”
Section: Fertilitysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Ovarian cycle length in rural Aymara women averaged 29.1 days, which falls within the observed range for sea level [ 13 ]. The proportion of ovulatory cycles, as assessed by progesterone levels, was comparable in a sample of Chicago women and economically advantaged women in La Paz, Bolivia (91 % and 88 % respectively); however, it was far lower (45 %) in the poorer women of La Paz [ 14 ].…”
Section: Fertilitysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For a sample of 612 cycles observed in 191 rural Aymara women, cycle length averaged 29.1 days (Vitzthum et al, 2000b). Compared to all other populations for which data are available in the literature, this Aymara sample falls neither particularly low nor high in the range of observed lengths, suggesting that if hypoxia does affect ovarian cycle duration the effect is insignificant.…”
Section: Length Of Ovarian Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…6, 7, S1), the extent of cycle variability remains underappreciated. ''Natural family planning'' (aka ''fertility awareness'') methods are still widely promoted even though they require an uncommon level of cycle regularity (Burkhart et al, 1999;Vitzthum et al, 2000b), and many behavioral studies unjustifiably assume a 28-day cycle having an idealized hormonal profile (Shirtcliff et al, 2001).…”
Section: Segment (Cycle) Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, of 303 Guatemalan women who self-identified as having regular cycles every 26-32 days, more than half were then observed to have 1 of 3 consecutive cycles fall outside this range (Burkhart et al, 1999). Bolivian, Indian, U.S. and European women all had similarly high levels of variability (Gunn et al, 1937;Chiazze et al, 1968;Mü n-ster et al, 1992;Belsey and Pinol, 1997;Vitzthum et al, 2000b;Creinin et al, 2004;Williams, 2006). About half or more of the woman in each study sample (Supporting Information Table S4) had a range in cycle length of 6 days and about a quarter had a range [2 weeks, even if only a few cycles were recorded by each woman.…”
Section: Segment (Cycle) Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%