2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual Suppression for Combat Operations: Advantages of Oral Contraceptive Pills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among those women who did not use COCs continuously, 35% had insufficient knowledge about menstrual suppression [19]. Another survey of female military personnel [20] showed that 66% desired menstrual suppression, although only 21% used COCs continuously [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among those women who did not use COCs continuously, 35% had insufficient knowledge about menstrual suppression [19]. Another survey of female military personnel [20] showed that 66% desired menstrual suppression, although only 21% used COCs continuously [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of women who might benefit from the use of continuous COCs to regulate menstruation include high-performance athletes during training and competitions or (as discussed earlier) women serving in the armed forces who are performing military duties during deployment and combat [19][20][21]24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 Among deployed women, 66% reported a strong desire for hormonally induced amenorrhea during deployment and 57% of those who used hormonal contraception to induce menstrual suppression reported high satisfaction with this method. 45, 59 Compared to conventional OCP users, those who used pills continuously reported greater adherence with daily pill use (53% vs. 100%, p=0.02, n=62 60 and 42% vs. 73%, p=0.02, n=500 59 ) and fewer lost duty days relating to menstrual disturbances (14% vs. 0%, n=62 60 and 21% vs. 12%, n=500 59 , no p-values reported). Given the possibility of menstrual suppression, both sexually active and abstinent servicewomen may benefit from hormonal contraceptive use.…”
Section: Active Duty Servicewomenmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Of note, desire for mandatory education about continuous COC usage in this population was high, with 86% reporting this type of education should be an entry requirement for all female personnel. 15 Knowledge gaps and compliance difficulties limit use for continuous COCs and therefore menstrual suppression in the military. 15 A small UK military study highlighted the need for military healthcare providers to counsel personnel about contraceptive options rather than leaving this responsibility with national healthcare providers due to the higher levels of exposure to female soldiers.…”
Section: Menstrual Suppression Methods For Astronautsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Knowledge gaps and compliance difficulties limit use for continuous COCs and therefore menstrual suppression in the military. 15 A small UK military study highlighted the need for military healthcare providers to counsel personnel about contraceptive options rather than leaving this responsibility with national healthcare providers due to the higher levels of exposure to female soldiers. LARCs had not been discussed with large numbers of personnel, whereas contraceptive use was not even documented in over half of the consultation records in the year leading up to the study.…”
Section: Menstrual Suppression Methods For Astronautsmentioning
confidence: 99%