1987
DOI: 10.2307/1381484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mensural Discrimination of Chromosomally Characterized Peromyscus oreas and P. maniculatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used dental or skull characters to identify shrews and voles. We used a tail-length threshold of 96 mm to separate adult P. keeni from P. maniculatus (Allard et al, 1987). In addition, we identified juveniles (<16 g) with undamaged tails 85 mm as P. maniculatus.…”
Section: Field and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used dental or skull characters to identify shrews and voles. We used a tail-length threshold of 96 mm to separate adult P. keeni from P. maniculatus (Allard et al, 1987). In addition, we identified juveniles (<16 g) with undamaged tails 85 mm as P. maniculatus.…”
Section: Field and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many istances, mensural and cranial characteristics, with subjective morphological raits such as pelage coloration and tail penciling, are used to differentiate between hese species. However, for some sympatric species of Peromyscus, ranges of lensural characteristics overlap, making it difficult to assign certain individuals ) species (Engstrom et al 1982, Thompson and Conley 1983, Allard et al 1987.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have differentiated between similar-looking, sympatric species of Peromyscus using discriminant function analyses of external or cranial measurements (Choate 1973, Choate et al 1979, Stromberg 1979, Feldhamer et al 1983, Thompson and Conley 1983, Allard et al 1987. While this method is valid for identifying individuals from sympatric Peromyscus populations, results differ among geographic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stepwise discriminant function analysis, using the DISCRIM programme of SPSS (Norusis/SPSS 1994), was performed on 24 cranial measurements to predict species membership for each specimen, and to reduce the number of characters needed to discriminate between the three species (Allard et al 1987). The criteria used for entering and removing variables from the stepwise discriminant function was minimization of Wilks' lambda, the F-test to enter or remove variables being set to 1.0 (default value) (Norusis/SPSS Inc. 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%