Mental and physical health in prison: how co-occurring conditions influence inmate misconduct

Semenza, Daniel C.; Grosholz, Jessica M.

doi:10.1186/s40352-018-0082-5

Cited by 43 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 77 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Notably, the lack of a relationship between vicarious chronic physical health strain and delinquency found here is corroborated by prior research suggesting that one’s own acute health problems create strain for individuals to engage in delinquency and misconduct, rather than experiences of chronic illness (Grosholz & Semenza, 2018; Semenza & Grosholz, 2019; Stogner & Gibson, 2010, 2011; Stogner et al, 2014). In particular, the research that analyzes acute physical health issues (e.g., headaches, joint pain, cold or flu, etc.)…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…In particular, the research that analyzes acute physical health issues (e.g., headaches, joint pain, cold or flu, etc.) and chronic health ailments separately finds that the increase in crime and misconduct is largely associated with experiencing acute health problems (Grosholz & Semenza, 2018; Semenza & Grosholz, 2019; Stogner & Gibson, 2010; Stogner et al, 2014). While vicarious measures of acute physical illness were not available among these data, we expect that vicarious acute physical health strain would be associated with juvenile delinquency given past findings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently scholars have begun to explore the often-overlooked role of physical health in understanding behavior. In particular, research has investigated the relationship between poor physical health and criminal behavior both in and out of confinement (Ford, 2014; Grosholz & Semenza, 2018; Kort-Butler, 2017; Piquero, Daigle, Gibson, Piquero, & Tibbetts, 2007; Piquero, Shepherd, Shepherd, & Farrington, 2011; Schroeder, Hill, Haynes, & Bradley, 2011; Semenza, 2018; Semenza & Grosholz, 2019; Stogner & Gibson, 2010, 2011; Stogner, Gibson, & Miller, 2014). Scholars find that poor physical health is associated with an increase in the likelihood of juvenile delinquency, adult offending, substance use, and institutional misconduct (Ford, 2014; Grosholz & Semenza, 2018; Kort-Butler, 2017; Schroeder et al, 2011; Semenza, 2018; Semenza & Grosholz, 2019; Stogner & Gibson, 2010, 2011; Stogner et al, 2014).…”

Section: Health Strainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Vicarious Family Health Strain and Juvenile Delinquency

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research finds that vicarious strain significantly predicts juvenile delinquency. However, no studies have examined the influence of vicarious health strain on youth behavior despite the fact that when individuals directly experience poor health, there is a greater likelihood of crime and delinquency. Using a sample of youth from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) data, we assess the associations between vicarious family health strain (both mental and physical) and juvenile delinquency. We find that vicarious physical health strain is not associated with juvenile delinquency. However, vicarious mental health strain is significantly associated with violent juvenile offending. Based on the results, we highlight various avenues for future research that continues to investigate the link between health and crime.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Health Strainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Vicarious Family Health Strain and Juvenile Delinquency

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Phase 2: 85% of the studies stated that data and information had been gathered to inform the PM exercise as a substitute for (55%), or in addition to (30%), the group knowledge generated in the facilitated process mapping sessions. This included evidence-based best practice recommendations [ 34 – 155 ], interviews [ 64 , 73 – 148 , 154 , 156 , 158 , 160 ], and more detailed approaches such as observations, operational data collection, time-and-motion studies, and video footage [ 48 , 78 – 81 , 141 , 143 – 146 , 150 , 159 , 163 – 169 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review

Antonacci

Lennox

Barlow

et al. 2021

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Process mapping (PM) supports better understanding of complex systems and adaptation of improvement interventions to their local context. However, there is little research on its use in healthcare. This study (i) proposes a conceptual framework outlining quality criteria to guide the effective implementation, evaluation and reporting of PM in healthcare; (ii) reviews published PM cases to identify context and quality of PM application, and the reported benefits of using PM in healthcare. Methods We developed the conceptual framework by reviewing methodological guidance on PM and empirical literature on its use in healthcare improvement interventions. We conducted a systematic review of empirical literature using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. Inclusion criteria were: full text empirical study; describing the process through which PM has been applied in a healthcare setting; published in English. Databases searched are: Medline, Embase, HMIC–Health Management Information Consortium, CINAHL-Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus. Two independent reviewers extracted and analysed data. Each manuscript underwent line by line coding. The conceptual framework was used to evaluate adherence of empirical studies to the identified PM quality criteria. Context in which PM is used and benefits of using PM were coded using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results The framework outlines quality criteria for each PM phase: (i) preparation, planning and process identification, (ii) data and information gathering, (iii) process map generation, (iv) analysis, (v) taking it forward. PM is used in a variety of settings and approaches to improvement. None of the reviewed studies (N = 105) met all ten quality criteria; 7% were compliant with 8/10 or 9/10 criteria. 45% of studies reported that PM was generated through multi-professional meetings and 15% reported patient involvement. Studies highlighted the value of PM in navigating the complexity characterising healthcare improvement interventions. Conclusion The full potential of PM is inhibited by variance in reporting and poor adherence to underpinning principles. Greater rigour in the application of the method is required. We encourage the use and further development of the proposed framework to support training, application and reporting of PM. Trial Registration Prospero ID: CRD42017082140

show abstract

“…Moreover, the prevalence of infectious diseases among incarcerated populations well surpasses that of non-incarcerated populations (Taxman & Ressler, 2010). In addition to these significant physical health disparities, rates of co-occurring disorders including behavioral health problems (e.g., substance misuse and mental health conditions) are alarming (Semenza & Grosholz, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linking individuals on probation to health care: a pilot randomized trial

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Probation offices represent a location where at-risk individuals in need of health care appear on a known and regular basis. We sought to study how providing linkages to health care could improve the proportion of underserved, justice-involved individuals accessing the health care system. This study tested a linkage and referral to health care intervention for individuals on probation designed by a local change team that brought together actors from multiple agencies and tasked them with increasing general practitioner physician access for probationers. The pilot trial randomized 400 individuals on probation in Delaware during 2016-2018 to determine the effectiveness of placing a health navigator in an urban probation office to refer people to an appointment with a primary care physician. The project also tested the impact of offering an incentive to probationers for attending a doctor's appointment. Results: Referral by a health navigator to a primary care physician was associated with a modest but significant increase in the proportion of individuals accessing care through a general practitioner physician. Offering an incentive had no significant impact on keeping the medical appointment above the effect of referral by the health navigator. Conclusions: Probation offices represent a location where at-risk individuals in need of health care appear on a known and regular basis. This study highlights how providing linkages to health care can improve the proportion of underserved individuals accessing the health care system.

show abstract

Mental and physical health in prison: how co-occurring conditions influence inmate misconduct

Cited by 43 publications

References 77 publications

Vicarious Family Health Strain and Juvenile Delinquency

Vicarious Family Health Strain and Juvenile Delinquency

Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review

Linking individuals on probation to health care: a pilot randomized trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About