Mental Health and Mental Wellbeing Impact Assessment Frameworks—A Systematic Review

Abstract

Mental health is largely shaped by the daily environments in which people live their lives, with positive components of mental health emphasising the importance of feeling good and functioning effectively. Promoting mental health relies on broad-based actions over multiple sectors, which can be difficult to measure. Different types of Impact Assessment (IA) frameworks allow for a structured approach to evaluating policy actions on different levels. A systematic review was performed exploring existing IA frameworks relating to mental health and mental wellbeing and how they have been used. A total of 145 records were identified from the databases, from which 9 articles were included in the review, with a further 6 studies included via reference list and citation chaining. Five different mental-health-related IA frameworks were found to be implemented in a variety of settings, mostly in relation to evaluating community actions. A Narrative Synthesis summarised key themes from the 15 included articles. Findings highlight the need for participatory approaches in IA, which have the dual purpose of informing the IA evaluation and advocating for the need to include mental health in policy development. However, it is important to ensure that IA frameworks are user-friendly, designed to be used by laypeople in a variety of sectors and that IA frameworks are operational in terms of time and monetary resources.

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Current Trends and Future Directions – A Narrative Review for a Comprehensive Insight

“…Mental health is an essential component of the health and well-being of a person and community, and it is critical for the individual, society, and socio-economic development of any country. 1,2 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), action toward prevention and early intervention in mental health is urgently needed and indisputable. 1 The changes in lifestyle, work pressure, and academic pressure lead to more psychological problems among the common population.…”

Mental and physiological wellbeing while rowing across the North Atlantic: a single-case study of subjective versus objective data

“…The present study presents the first investigation of a long-duration exhausting activity on the high sea under difficult environmental conditions based on a case study using periodic subjective self-reports and objective self-measurements (mixed-method design). The self-reports assess the sleep quality and mental wellbeing [defined as a state in which the individual can cope with stresses of life ( Cresswell-Smith et al, 2022 )]. The self-measurements reflect the autonomic body control, specifically, the ability of the body to adapt to varying physiological, psychological, and environmental challenges.…”