2023
DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s399546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Health and Sleep Quality of Healthcare Providers After Partial Relief of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Purpose We aimed to assess sleep quality and psychological distress among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the context of mitigated governmental restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study included 370 HCWs from a single tertiary healthcare institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sleep quality and psychological distress were measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25% of HCWs in the study were men, and 75% of HCWs were women. It was lower than the research in China (with 85.02% of HCWs being women, and 14.98% of HCWs being men) [24] However, the results of our study were higher than the results of research in Saudi Arabia [25]. This can be explained as follows: The participants in our study were HCWs working at health facilities where the rate of women were usually taller than men,…”
Section: The Sociodemographic Characteristics Of Participantscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…25% of HCWs in the study were men, and 75% of HCWs were women. It was lower than the research in China (with 85.02% of HCWs being women, and 14.98% of HCWs being men) [24] However, the results of our study were higher than the results of research in Saudi Arabia [25]. This can be explained as follows: The participants in our study were HCWs working at health facilities where the rate of women were usually taller than men,…”
Section: The Sociodemographic Characteristics Of Participantscontrasting
confidence: 85%