2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63761-3_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Health in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COVID‐19 epidemic not only aggravated the workload and pressure of medical staff, 60 but also negatively affected the mental state of front‐line medical staff 61–66 . It also magnifies the imbalance between supply and demand of medical resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COVID‐19 epidemic not only aggravated the workload and pressure of medical staff, 60 but also negatively affected the mental state of front‐line medical staff 61–66 . It also magnifies the imbalance between supply and demand of medical resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be assumed that this is related to the reports on COVID-19 during the early days of the pandemic, which suggested that the prevalence of COVID-19 in patients with cancer was high and that cancer patients comprised an at-risk population for COVID-19 [ 1 , 2 ]. Indeed, frequency, duration, and diversity of media exposure are related to COVID-19-asscociated fear in the general population [ 86 ] and cancer patients are likely no exception. Interestingly, however, cancer participants in this study reported shorter screen time (TV, smartphones, laptops) ( Table S1 ) during the study period compared to non-cancer participants; they therefore likely had less exposure to multimedia and scary information compared to non-cancer participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, with respect to cognitive emotion regulation, findings were mixed for different strategies 27,29 and also for single strategies in different studies 24,27 . To our knowledge, only a small share of longitudinal studies compared the predictive value of a broader set of RFs 27,28,30 , with many only investigating different aspects of a single RF and none of the studies focusing on the relationship between RFs or a broader range of stress-related outcomes including positive aspects.…”
Section: Note the Selection Of Resilience Factors Is Based On An Upda...mentioning
confidence: 99%