2004
DOI: 10.7870/cjcmh-2004-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Health Reform, Economic Globalization and the Practice of Citizenship

Abstract: Drawing on research conducted in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec it is argued that tension exists between mental health reforms born out of concern for the well-being and care of people and those that are being driven by costcontainment and efficiency. Contributing to this tension are competing discourses about mental health and mental illness. It is argued that progressive change requires the meaningful engagement of mental health care recipients in policy decision-making processes and ongoing analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crabtree and Chong () place citizenship at the center of a dialog between individuals and the state, with mental health of individuals and society sharing the center as imperative to the health of democratic societies. Morrow () employs citizenship to identify between mental health reform on one hand and cost containment on the other and argues for the voices and participation of mental health‐care recipients in this debate. Finally, Prior () links theories of citizenship and human rights to confronting the stigmatization of persons with mental illness and to activism for their access to housing, employment, and family life.…”
Section: Citizenship: Origins and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crabtree and Chong () place citizenship at the center of a dialog between individuals and the state, with mental health of individuals and society sharing the center as imperative to the health of democratic societies. Morrow () employs citizenship to identify between mental health reform on one hand and cost containment on the other and argues for the voices and participation of mental health‐care recipients in this debate. Finally, Prior () links theories of citizenship and human rights to confronting the stigmatization of persons with mental illness and to activism for their access to housing, employment, and family life.…”
Section: Citizenship: Origins and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of Janoski's () four citizenship rights, it may be tilted toward social and participation rights, but only as a balance to the more traditionally citizenship‐identified Rs of rights and responsibilities. Like Duffy (), Mouffe (), and Morrow (), our citizenship framework also emphasizes the participation of peers—persons with lived experience of mental illness—in its production and processes. Peers, in fact, have been centrally involved in citizenship community‐building efforts (Rowe, ; Rowe et al., ).…”
Section: Citizenship: Origins and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, mental health care services, be they clinical housing, disabilitybased income support, or treatment services, are all directed towards the reproduction of labelled people. As a set of services for social reproduction, mental health care is shaped by the prevailing economic ideology and dominant understandings of mental illness communicated through social policy (Morrow, 2004) as well as through processes of service provisioning. Together, economic ideology and the dominant understandings of mental illness define who is targeted by or has access to the system, what kind of services are provided, and, importantly, what goals are informing this system of 'care.'…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deinstitutionalization of mental health services began in Canada and other countries in the 1960s-70s with the rapid closure of psychiatric hospitals followed by further reductions in general hospital admissions for mental health in the 1990s (85). In most countries, the motivations for this change included breakthroughs in pharmaceutical treatments (86) combined with an emphasis on human rights and social inclusion of persons with mental illness (87), and the expectation of better outcomes in the community (88).…”
Section: Trans-institutionalization and The Criminal Justice Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%