2021
DOI: 10.2196/28369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Health Screening in General Practices as a Means for Enhancing Uptake of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Observational Cohort Study

Abstract: Background Digital mental health interventions stand to play a critical role in managing the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, enhancing their uptake is a key priority. General practitioners (GPs) are well positioned to facilitate access to digital interventions, but tools that assist GPs in identifying suitable patients are lacking. Objective This study aims to evaluate the suitability of a web-based mental health screening and treat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including PPI panels in the development of questionnaires can enhance the validity of the questions asked and ensure a comprehensive question set ( 88 ). Any opportunity to improve the validity of questions asked in a digital mental health assessment should be pursued, particularly as a systematic review of the validity of digital psychiatric assessment tools is lacking high-quality evidence ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Including PPI panels in the development of questionnaires can enhance the validity of the questions asked and ensure a comprehensive question set ( 88 ). Any opportunity to improve the validity of questions asked in a digital mental health assessment should be pursued, particularly as a systematic review of the validity of digital psychiatric assessment tools is lacking high-quality evidence ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMHIs are able to address geographical and service level barriers to accessing mental health services, such as understaffing and medical coverage of more remote areas ( 23 ) providing support to healthcare providers. In return, healthcare providers can facilitate engagement with DMHIs, as evidence shows that two-thirds of individuals prescribed a digital intervention for depressive or anxiety symptoms by their GP reported using it ( 24 ). Additionally, DMHIs can address non-service level barriers associated with accessing traditional face-to-face mental health care, such as patients experiencing difficulties or distress in disclosing mental health concerns, or perceived stigmatization ( 23 , 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent Australian-focused scoping review found 52 evidence-based DMHIs for a range of indications: depression ( n = 9, 17%); anxiety ( n = 15, 29%); general mental well-being ( n = 13, 25%); multiple issues ( n = 13, 25%); and distress in the form of suicidal ideation ( n = 2, 4%) ( 16 ). Although many DMHIs are of a good quality and circumvent many of the barriers to help-seeking ( 17 20 ), uptake remains low, particularly in priority populations such as males, indigenous Australians, and those of low socio-economic situations ( 21 23 ). Uptake is low because of the overwhelming choice of apps ( 24 ) and uncertainty among both practitioners and consumers in which ones are efficacious ( 25 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%