2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental health screening tools in correctional institutions: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundPast studies have identified poor rates of detection of mental illness among inmates. Consequently, mental health screening is a common feature to various correctional mental health strategies and best practice guidelines. However, there is little guidance to support the selection of an appropriate tool. This systematic review compared the sensitivity and specificity of mental health screening tools among adult jail or prison populations.MethodsA systematic review of MEDLINE and PsycINFO up to 2011, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review identified five evidence-supported screening tools for psychological distress among incarcerated individuals (50), four of which can be administered in 5 minutes or less. Screening, and when indicated, treatment, for psychological distress among women involved in the criminal justice system may improve the overall health of women, make for a more successful return to the community, and reduce recidivism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review identified five evidence-supported screening tools for psychological distress among incarcerated individuals (50), four of which can be administered in 5 minutes or less. Screening, and when indicated, treatment, for psychological distress among women involved in the criminal justice system may improve the overall health of women, make for a more successful return to the community, and reduce recidivism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain the problems that have persisted problems with prison health screening, despite system re-organisation (Senior et al, 2013). It is generally accepted that the bulk of screening of prisoners for physical and mental health problems is a useful way to identify morbidity (Birmingham, 2001); however, international research has yet to reach a settled conclusion regarding screening tool of optimal choice (Martin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the research evidence regarding screening tool selection is limited in scope (Martin, Colman, Simpson, & McKenzie, 2013), many prison health care teams have tried to introduce local screening adaptations in an attempt to improve efficacy (Shaw et al, 2008). Few of these initiatives have, however, been evaluated and published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre los principales obstáculos identificados se encuentran el estigma, la carga de enfermedad, las dificultades para mantener la abstinencia, la carencia de redes sociales de apoyo y las creencias sobre la sustancia o la condición de salud mental (Hartwell et al, 2013;Romero Mendoza et al, 2010); además de la falta de sostenibilidad de los servicios de salud mental en prisión (Shackman & Price, 2013). Por último, se ha reconocido que contar con herramientas adecuadas de detección y evaluación de trastornos mentales en el contexto penitenciario es una estrategia viable y pertinente para atender las necesidades de salud mental de esta población (Casares-López et al, 2011;Martin, Colman, Simpson, & McKenzie, 2013), pues un tratamiento adecuado dentro de prisión podría facilitar la retención en servicios de atención posteriores.…”
Section: Casares-lópezunclassified