Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide

Abstract

ObjectivesThe WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH).DesignWe searched studies excluded from our updated mhGAP-IG systematic review, and included in other relevant systematic reviews, for evidence and experience of initiatives integrating mental health into PHC and CBH. Our 24 November 2020 mhGAP-IG search encompassed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie and Google Scholar. Although heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, we descriptively summarised the evidence-base.ResultsOut of 1827 results, we identified 208 relevant records. They described randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions (98 studies, n=55 523 participants), non-randomised studies measuring clinical outcomes (22 studies, n=7405), training outcomes (36 studies, n=12 280) and implementation outcomes (21 studies, n=1090), plus descriptive accounts (18 studies, n=2526), baseline surveys and exploratory studies (6 studies, n=17 093) and commentaries (7 studies). Most (40%) were conducted in the African region, region of the Americas (16%), and South-East Asia (13%). Randomised and non-randomised studies reported improved symptoms, substance use, functioning, parenting and child outcomes. Non-randomised studies reported improved clinical knowledge, confidence and skills following training.ConclusionsThe literature beyond the mhGAP-IG is extensive and shares common findings. Future priorities are less-studied regions, interventions for severe mental illness, exploring ways that mhGAP-IG and alternative approaches complement each other in different contexts and scaling-up mental health integration.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017068459.

Establishment of the Community Mental Health Centres in Uganda Communities: Challenges and Prospects

“…Strong association with AA evidently allowed these individuals to consolidate their behavioural self-efficacy with regard to the control of their alcoholism [12]. In the study by Keynejad, Spagnolo and Thornicroft [15], they confirmed that the findings of the mental health gap action programme intervention guide evidencebased to support the need for research and policy addressing obstacles to the successful combination of mental health into primary health care (PHC) and community-based health settings (CBH), and the need to prioritize neglected disorders, including severe mental illness. An important development in self-help in community mental health centres is the application of group therapy techniques to the situations of mentally challenged individuals.…”

Current perspectives on perinatal mental health and neurobehavioral development: focus on regulation, coregulation and self-regulation

“…Within science, integration from diverse disciplines and building transdisciplinary evidence is critical to address the challenge of promoting neurobehavioral development globally. That researchers have an important responsibility in perinatal mental healthcare and in communicating results concerning perinatal environmental exposure, neurodevelopment, and interventions is emphasized in several fields [15 ▪ ,118,154,193,205,208,230,240–251,257 ▪ ]. Community-oriented participatory research with key stakeholders [252], and community engagement [238] to gather ‘bottom-up’ concerns from parents and practitioners [253] is needed, and may contribute to advocacy [239,253].…”

Idioms of distress: Feasibility trial findings on reducing somatic symptoms through a community-based, culturally integrated intervention in Somaliland

“…8 Lacking data on program implementation within Somaliland specifically, previous research has supported the efficacy of community-based mental health programs in LMICs. 34 This includes studies finding significant reduction in symptoms following group interventions led by members of the community despite an otherwise lack of formal mental health training.…”