Synesthesia based in visual modalities has been associated with reports of vivid visual imagery. We extend this finding to consider whether other forms of synesthesia are also associated with enhanced imagery, and whether this enhancement reflects the modality of synesthesia. We used self-report imagery measures across multiple sensory modalities, comparing synesthetes' responses (with a variety of forms of synesthesia) to those of nonsynesthete matched controls. Synesthetes reported higher levels of visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory and tactile imagery and a greater level of imagery use. Furthermore, their reported enhanced imagery is restricted to the modalities involved in the individual's synesthesia. There was also a relationship between the number of forms of synesthesia an individual has, and the reported vividness of their imagery, highlighting the need for future research to consider the impact of multiple forms of synesthesia. We also recommend the use of behavioral measures to validate these self-report findings.KEYWORDS: synesthesia, mental imagery, visual imagery, auditory imagery, gustatory imagery, tactile imagery, olfactory imagery Highlights: We compare self-reported mental imagery across many variants of synesthesia. Synesthetes report more vivid imagery than controls across multiple modalities. Enhanced imagery is limited to modalities involved in an individual's synesthesia. We advise researchers to consider the impact of multiple forms of synesthesia.