Mental workload characteristics of manipulator teleoperators with different spatial cognitive abilities

Abstract

The main research on manipulator teleoperation includes robust of high-degree of freedom manipulators, sensor measurement accuracy, time delay, and mechanical structure design. Increased mental capacity requirements for complex assignments result in an increased mental workload. Spatial cognitive ability was considered to be the key factor affecting teleoperation performance. To accomplish this, we had 50 participants performed teleoperation while recorded their electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogram data of each task were divided into two periods, which correspond to the observation and large-scale transfer stages of teleoperation, respectively (period 1) and adjust the attitude of the manipulator to approach and align with the target stage (period 2). Brain topographic maps of period 1 (period 1 wavelet packet energy minus resting state wavelet packet energy) and period 2 (period 2 wavelet packet energy minus resting state wavelet packet energy) show that the frontal, central, and occipital regions are the main working areas of low spatial cognitive operators in period 1, while the frontal, central, and occipital regions are the main working areas of high spatial cognitive operators in period 1. The main changes in period 2 were frontal, central, parietal, and occipital regions. This study has implication for the analysis of electroencephalogram signal characteristics of mental workload in different populations to improve operators’ well-being and safety at teleoperation work.

Considerations and Challenges of Measuring Operator Performance in Telepresence and Teleoperation Entailing Mixed Reality Technologies

“…The most popular objective measurement techniques used in telepresence and teleoperation in current literature remain spatial-related and time-based metrics [29,56,57]. In addition to these, some studies also include behavioural and physical measures such as Electroencephalograms (EEGs), Electrocardiograms (ECGs) and even Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRIs) [5,14,34,40,49].…”

Framework to Estimate Operating Intention for a Leader–Follower Robot

“…The operator has to manipulate the follower robot based on this limited information, leading to an escalation in the information load that the operator needs to handle or speculate about. Consequently, this raises the overall burden on the operator during extended periods of work [15,16]. (ii) Under the influence of fatigue, it is hard for the operator to maintain the required posture or predetermined motion inside the cockpit of the leader system for a long time [16][17][18].…”

Characteristic Differences between Novices and Experts in Different Shooting Stages

“…In the man-gun system, the reaction time and accuracy of capturing a target are the main factors a ecting performance. e shooting process includes three psychological states, which are noticing the target, determining the position of the target [4], and shooting. Shooting performance depends on hold control, aiming accuracy, and trigger control [2].…”