2018
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MentaLiST – A fast MLST caller for large MLST schemes

Abstract: MLST (multi-locus sequence typing) is a classic technique for genotyping bacteria, widely applied for pathogen outbreak surveillance. Traditionally, MLST is based on identifying sequence types from a small number of housekeeping genes. With the increasing availability of whole-genome sequencing data, MLST methods have evolved towards larger typing schemes, based on a few hundred genes [core genome MLST (cgMLST)] to a few thousand genes [whole genome MLST (wgMLST)]. Such large-scale MLST schemes have been shown… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure the performance of our application on the traditional seven loci MLST analysis, we compared STing (v0.24.2) in two execution modes, fast and sensitive, along with six applications able to perform sequence typing (stringMLST 4 , MentaLiST 11 , Kestrel 12 , SRST2 13 , ARIBA 14 , and Offline CGE/DTU; Supplementary Table 3). These applications can be classified into five groups depending on the strategy (algorithmic paradigm) used to predict the sequence types of whole genome sequencing data samples from bacterial isolates: k -mer, k -mer plus alignment, mapping, mapping plus local assembly, and assembly (Supplementary Table 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the performance of our application on the traditional seven loci MLST analysis, we compared STing (v0.24.2) in two execution modes, fast and sensitive, along with six applications able to perform sequence typing (stringMLST 4 , MentaLiST 11 , Kestrel 12 , SRST2 13 , ARIBA 14 , and Offline CGE/DTU; Supplementary Table 3). These applications can be classified into five groups depending on the strategy (algorithmic paradigm) used to predict the sequence types of whole genome sequencing data samples from bacterial isolates: k -mer, k -mer plus alignment, mapping, mapping plus local assembly, and assembly (Supplementary Table 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MentaLiST pipeline generates MLST allelic calls directly from read data, avoiding slow and computationally expensive genome assembly. MentaLiST's allele calling concordance with other popular genome-scale MLST programs is greater than 99% (36).…”
Section: Irida Performs Analyses Of Sequence Data and Metadata With Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRIDA facilitates cgMLST analysis through the integration of MentaLiST, a fast k-mer based MLST and cgMLST calculation engine enabling genotyping of bacterial samples directly from read data (36). MentaLiST's ability to call alleles directly from raw sequence reads bypasses time-consuming assembly, and is specifically designed and implemented to handle large typing schemes (i.e.…”
Section: Multi-locus Sequence Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they have proven to be valuable typing methods in many studies, and they are becoming standard approaches for pathogen surveillance [7]. In this study, we used the recently published MentaLiST [9], an in-house k-mer based MLST caller designed specifically for handling large MLST schemes.…”
Section: Multilocus Sequence Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%