2023
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentalization Scale (MentS): Validity and reliability of the Iranian version in a sample of nonclinical adults

Ahmad Asgarizadeh,
Elahe Vahidi,
Parisa Sadat Seyed Mousavi
et al.

Abstract: IntroductionMentalizing incapacity is increasingly identified as a common factor in psychopathology. The Mentalization Scale (MentS) is a cost‐effective measure built upon the dimensional model of mentalizing. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of MentS.MethodsTwo samples of community‐based adults (N1 = 450, N2 = 445) completed different batteries of self‐report measures. In addition to MentS, participants completed measures of reflective functioning and attachment insecuri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Recently, the Iranian version of the MentS was preliminarily validated in samples of nonclinical adults. 38 In the current study, Cronbach's αs for the total scale, MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, were 0.85, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.74, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 42%
“…37 Recently, the Iranian version of the MentS was preliminarily validated in samples of nonclinical adults. 38 In the current study, Cronbach's αs for the total scale, MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, were 0.85, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.74, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 42%