Mentalization, specific attachment, and relational satisfaction from the intrapsychic and interpersonal perspectives

Abstract

Mentalization is a process of social cognition that involves making inferences about one’s own behavior and the behavior of other people on the basis of unobservable mental states. Particularly in psychodynamic approaches, mentalization is conceptualized in the context of activation of internal representation of emotional relationship. In this study, we checked whether mentalization constitutes a predictor of relational satisfaction in the context of one’s own and the partner’s specific attachment. The research sample was composed of 32 heterosexual couples living together for at least two years. Three tools were applied: the Mental State Task, Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures, and the Relationship Assessment Scale. The results indicate a strong negative effect of one’s own attachment anxiety and avoidance, and a strong effect of the partner’s attachment anxiety on the relationship satisfaction for both men and women. In women, the incremental validity of mentalization in predicting satisfaction in the relationship beyond the attachment of their partners has been observed. The results are discussed in the context of the intrapsychic and interpersonal aspects of mentalization and attachment.

Mentalization in borderline individuals: an attempt to integrate contradictory research results

“…These results are consistent with those of the already cited studies involving interviews in which borderline individuals unambiguously exhibited mentalization deficits. There have also been studies on change in the level of mentalization caused by attachment system activation, conducted on individuals without pathological personality structure (Górska, 2015). The subjects scored higher on mentalization than borderline individuals, although also in this group of people a diverse level of this capacity was found, as well as specific fluctuations in access to mentalization following the activation of various attachment representations.…”