1995
DOI: 10.1016/0160-2527(95)00014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentally ill offenders referred for psychiatric examination in Japan: Descriptive statistics of a university unit of forensic assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Italy, an expert must accept a court appointment and neither psychological nor behavioural tests are allowed as parts of psychiatric examinations (Corso, 1993). In Japan, Satsumi and Oda (1995) found that experts can be retained by the prosecution, the defence, or by the court (Simon & AhnRedding, 2006). In Germany, although court-chosen witnesses may be called to testify, party-selected witnesses cannot testify at all (Timmerbeil, 2003).…”
Section: Civil Lawmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Italy, an expert must accept a court appointment and neither psychological nor behavioural tests are allowed as parts of psychiatric examinations (Corso, 1993). In Japan, Satsumi and Oda (1995) found that experts can be retained by the prosecution, the defence, or by the court (Simon & AhnRedding, 2006). In Germany, although court-chosen witnesses may be called to testify, party-selected witnesses cannot testify at all (Timmerbeil, 2003).…”
Section: Civil Lawmentioning
confidence: 98%