Mentoring experience and its effects on medical interns

Han, Eui-Ryoung; Chung, Eun-Kyung; Oh, Sang Gi; Woo, Young Jong; Hitchcock, Maurice A.

doi:10.11622/smedj.2014157

Cited by 14 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Results were exported to EndNote and 936 duplicates were removed, yielding 1,503 unique citations that were manually screened for relevance (see Figure 1). Sixty-five quantitative studies 13–77 and 26 qualitative studies 78–103 met inclusion criteria, for a total of 91 studies included in our review. Appendix 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included studies and their respective quality assessments.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…40 Secondly, gender imbalance in mentor participation needs to be addressed. While mentors of either gender should be equally effective, especially for female members, to support their academic activities [41][42][43], female mentors might be necessary for female mentees for a various reasons, such as their ability to serve as role models on combining the demands of their career with family commitments and better understand female mentees undergoing training [42,44,45]. Therefore, it is necessary to cultivate and recruit female senior medical staff as mentors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mentee-mentor Satisfaction among Junior Doctors and Senior Medical Staff at Two Australian hospitals: A Longitudinal Study of a Mentoring Program.

David

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundMentoring is a unique educational workplace relationship that can support the skill, knowledge, social and emotional needs of both the mentee and mentor. This study aimed to assess the level of participant satisfaction in achieving these aims for a mentoring program implemented at two hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. MethodsUsing a quantitative approach, survey data were collected from 22 junior doctors (the mentees) and 21 senior medical staff (the mentors) at pre-, mid-and post-program. Between group differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fishers’ exact test, while temporal trend was assessed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results Though no temporal trends or mentee-mentor differences reached statistical significance, junior doctors were found to initiate mentee-mentor meetings more frequently, at both mid-program (50% vs 30%) and post-program (50% vs 19). In addition mentees displayed higher levels of program satisfaction when compared to their mentors at mid-program (100% vs 85%) and post-gram (94% vs 75%). ConclusionsMentoring, if implemented correctly and well-timed, undoubtedly has the necessary properties to enhance each participating party’s professional and personal lives, be they doctors or not.

show abstract

“…83,84, To realize their "defining" roles, the host should design and incorporate the mentoring program as part of the formal curriculum. 87,88,94,95,98,104,111,116,117,119,126,130,134,136,139,148,150,155 This will provide the program leaders with administrative, financial, and training support that will help streamline their response to the changing needs of the stakeholders and the mentoring process. 67,87,91,92,99,101,106,107,111,118,127,138,146 Such resources will ensure that codes of conduct, standards of practice, timelines, roles, and responsibilities to be adhered to by mentees, mentors and the educationalists and administrators designing and spearheading the program are clearly overseen.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Pivotal Role of Host Organizations in Enhancing Mentoring in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review

Chia

Tay

Xiao

et al. 2020

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, mentoring offers personalized training and plays a key role in continuing medical education and the professional development of healthcare professionals. However, poor structuring of the mentoring process has been attributed to failings of the host organization and, as such, we have conducted a scoping review on the role of the host organization in mentoring programs. Guided by Levac et al’s methodological framework and a combination of thematic and content analysis, this scoping review identifies their “defining” and secondary roles. Whilst the “defining” role of the host is to set standards, nurture, and oversee the mentoring processes and relationships, the secondary roles comprise of supporting patient care and specific responsibilities toward the mentee, mentor, program, and organization itself. Critically, striking a balance between structure and flexibility within the program is important to ensure consistency in the mentoring approach whilst accounting for the changing needs and goals of the mentees and mentors.

show abstract

Mentoring experience and its effects on medical interns

Cited by 14 publications

References 27 publications

Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review

Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review

Mentee-mentor Satisfaction among Junior Doctors and Senior Medical Staff at Two Australian hospitals: A Longitudinal Study of a Mentoring Program.

The Pivotal Role of Host Organizations in Enhancing Mentoring in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About