2015
DOI: 10.1177/0893318915574311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentoring in Academe

Abstract: We analyzed the mentoring narratives of women of color in faculty in engineering using feminist poststructural narratological lenses. We found that university mentoring systems were designed to align with master narratives of mentoring but did not coincide with women faculty's own mentoring stories. Specifically, women engineers regarded their mentee experiences and cultures of mentoring with varying levels of suspicion, ambiguity, vulnerability, and dis/enchantment that became embodied in alternative subject … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because only 18.5% of our sample were faculty of color, we were unable to statistically test whether the relation between mentoring and professional satisfaction or turnover risk depends on a combination of faculty gender and race. Some qualitative research suggests that mentoring experiences of women faculty of color in STEM include some positive, some negative, and some ambivalent components (Buzzenell et al 2015). However, this former study did not compare the experiences of women of color relative to White women in STEM, which remains a gap in the literature that needs to be addressed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Because only 18.5% of our sample were faculty of color, we were unable to statistically test whether the relation between mentoring and professional satisfaction or turnover risk depends on a combination of faculty gender and race. Some qualitative research suggests that mentoring experiences of women faculty of color in STEM include some positive, some negative, and some ambivalent components (Buzzenell et al 2015). However, this former study did not compare the experiences of women of color relative to White women in STEM, which remains a gap in the literature that needs to be addressed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Despite research which has focused on gender and STEM (Blackburn, 2017;Buzzanell, Long, Anderson, Kokini, & Batra, 2015) as well as literataure which has focused on women and leadership (Ely et al, 2011;Ibarra, Ely, & Kolb, 2013), the scholarship examining women's leadership in STEM career fields is lacking (Dutta, 2018;McCullough, 2011). The intent of this study was to explore perceived social support and (Greenhaus & Powell, 2006) and perceived promotability (Carlson et al, 2011;Paustian-Underdahl et al, 2016).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the wealth of literature on mentoring students, there is an abundance of research on mentoring faculty. This mentoring can come from early-, mid-, and late-career opportunities, through formal and informal support networks on campus (Buzzanell et al 2015;Gorman et al 2010;Thomas, Bystydzienski, and Desai 2015), through associations (Saville 2014), national organizations (Xu and Martin 2011), or through personal connections. Women faculty may seek advice on publishing, grants, colleagues, work-family balance, or career advice in general (Feeney and Bernal 2010).…”
Section: Faculty Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%