2016 17th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies (PDCAT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pdcat.2016.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mePaaS: Mobile-Embedded Platform as a Service for Distributing Fog Computing to Edge Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Yangui et al [4] and Pahl et al [10], the PaaS architecture proposed by Liyanage et al [5] enables generating the best deployment plan by proposing a component distribution scheme. In addition, they incorporate a publication/discovery mechanism for the underlying node's specifications using Service Description Metadata (SDM).…”
Section: The State-of-the-art and Its Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to Yangui et al [4] and Pahl et al [10], the PaaS architecture proposed by Liyanage et al [5] enables generating the best deployment plan by proposing a component distribution scheme. In addition, they incorporate a publication/discovery mechanism for the underlying node's specifications using Service Description Metadata (SDM).…”
Section: The State-of-the-art and Its Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application providers use PaaS to provision (i.e., develop, deploy, manage, and orchestrate) applications in the cloud. However, existing PaaS solutions (including IoT PaaS solutions) usually focus on cloud computing and do not enable the provisioning of applications with components spanning both cloud and fog, e.g., references [4]- [5]. Provisioning applications that span the cloud and fogs requires novel functions such as application graph generation, which are absent from existing cloud PaaS solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic deployment is achieved by integrating continuous deployment technology on the edge of the network while coping with IoT's intrinsic heterogeneity [170,99]. As IoT devices may be offline for quite some time, an orchestrator needs to gracefully cope with loss of connectivity [133] and increased likelihood of failing devices [166].…”
Section: Dynamismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed computing on the device layer focuses on collaboration and partitioning of application execution load across the IoT architecture layers. Mist computing [43,55] involves sensor and actuator devices in the application-specific data processing. The goal is to introduce proactivity with self-and contextawareness for edge application execution.…”
Section: Device Layer Distributed Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to introduce proactivity with self-and contextawareness for edge application execution. However, the presented platforms are centrally controlled and based on the service-oriented architecture paradigm [43]. Other proposed solutions include mobile edge clouds [14], MCC [15,20], femtoclouds [22] and mobile fog [25].…”
Section: Device Layer Distributed Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%