2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma – A one-year real life Portuguese study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study resemble these data, with a 74% reduction in exacerbations requiring emergency or hospitalization and a significant improvement in mean FEV1 of 10.3%. Real-life studies also reported improvements in lung function, asthma control, reduced the usage of OCS bursts, and maintenance OCS, and decreased eosinophil counts and exacerbations [29,31,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. Among these studies, we found a systematic review by Israel E. et al (2021) reflecting similar results in both prospective and retrospective studies [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of our study resemble these data, with a 74% reduction in exacerbations requiring emergency or hospitalization and a significant improvement in mean FEV1 of 10.3%. Real-life studies also reported improvements in lung function, asthma control, reduced the usage of OCS bursts, and maintenance OCS, and decreased eosinophil counts and exacerbations [29,31,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. Among these studies, we found a systematic review by Israel E. et al (2021) reflecting similar results in both prospective and retrospective studies [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The 73% (p = 0.004) and 83% (p values not reported) showed reductions in the rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization; 27% to 84% had discontinued maintenance OCS and from 32% to 100% had reduced the initial maintenance dose (p < 0.001); lung function improved by 3% to 8% (p < 0.05); reductions in blood eosinophilic counts from 69% to 92% (p < 0.05); and changes in ACT from 5 to 8 points [42]. However, there are studies in which an improvement in lung function was not achieved, which may be due to the difference in population, history of smoking, or smaller sample size [45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%