1998
DOI: 10.2307/2539243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, defensive realists predict that Japan will enhance its defensive capabilities whilst assuring its neighbours that it is not on a path to remilitarisation. Finally, Japan, defensive realists predict, will utilise its economic strength to pursue power via mercantilist policies (Heginbotham and Samuels, 1998;Green 2001). Overall, neorealist interpretations highlight the explanatory power of post-Cold War…”
Section: African East-asian Affairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, defensive realists predict that Japan will enhance its defensive capabilities whilst assuring its neighbours that it is not on a path to remilitarisation. Finally, Japan, defensive realists predict, will utilise its economic strength to pursue power via mercantilist policies (Heginbotham and Samuels, 1998;Green 2001). Overall, neorealist interpretations highlight the explanatory power of post-Cold War…”
Section: African East-asian Affairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Japan's prioritisation of the economic aspects of international relations has led several scholars to classify its foreign policy as mercantile realism (Heginbotham and Samuels, 1998). This economic logic is evident in the Yoshida Doctrine, Japan's first major post-war foreign policy doctrine.…”
Section: Linking Economic and Maritime Security: Piracy And Shipping mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, analysis of Japan's shifting foreign/security policies by Heginbotham and Samuels (1998;, Singh (2002), Hughes (2005), Shuja (2006), Samuels (2006), and Kliman (2006), and specifically, its China policy by Green and Self (1996), Green (1999;, and Choi (2003), came up with terminologies like "normal country", "mercantile realism", "reluctant realism", "creeping realism", "transitional realism", and "selective realism", to characterise what they saw as Japan's increasingly realist-oriented external/security orientations, and its inclination towards a containment-cum-engagement strategy, or policy of hedging against China's rise in the fluid East Asian environment. A realist-oriented definition of engagement is partially employed by Drifte (2003), and Hughes (2005), who both see Japan as having chosen a policy that is "based on providing China with economic and political incentives, hedged by military balancing through its own military force and the military alliance with the US" (Drifte 2003:3).…”
Section: Contending Approaches To Explaining Japanese-chinese Relatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for exampleStrange (1992: 1-15),Baldwin (1985),Keohane and Nye (1977). 7 This phenomenon has also been referred to as 'mercantile realism': mobilizing potential power while carefully hedging against possible threats(Heginbotham and Samuels 1998). 8 For more on this argument seeRadtke (2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%