1999
DOI: 10.1104/pp.121.3.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercuric Chloride Effects on Root Water Transport in Aspen Seedlings

Abstract: HgCl 2 (0.1 mM) reduced pressure-induced water flux and root hydraulic conductivity in the roots of 1-year-old aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings by about 50%. The inhibition was reversed with 50 mM mercaptoethanol. Mercurial treatment reduced the activation energy of water transport in the roots from 10.82 ؎ 0.700 kcal mol ؊1 to 6.67 ؎ 0.193 kcal mol ؊1 when measured over the 4°C to 25°C temperature range. An increase in rhodamine B concentration in the xylem sap of mercury-treated roots suggested a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
120
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
120
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For both the distal root region and the dissected stele of O. acanthocarpa, inhibition by 50 m HgCl 2 was fully reversed by subsequent treatment with 10 mm 2-mercaptoethanol, suggesting that a toxic reaction was unlikely, as is also observed for roots of Allium cepa (Barrowclough et al, 2000) and A. deserti (North and Nobel, 2000). The 32% reduction of L P by 50 m HgCl 2 for roots of O. acanthocarpa under wet conditions is smaller than inhibitions using that concentration for A. cepa (57%-84% inhibition; Barrowclough et al, 2000), A. deserti (60%; North and Nobel, 2000), Capsicum annuum (66%; Carvajal et al, 1999), Cucumis melo (80%; Carvajal et al, 2000), barley (Hordeum vulgare; 90%; Tazawa et al, 1997), P. tremuloides (47%; Wan and Zwiazek, 1999), or bread wheat (66%; Carvajal et al, 1996). In any case, not all aquaporins are sensitive to mercury (Daniels et al, 1994;Otto and Kaldenhoff, 2000), and the penetration of HgCl 2 may by blocked by suberized cell layers (Barrowclough et al, 2000), such as the endodermis or periderm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For both the distal root region and the dissected stele of O. acanthocarpa, inhibition by 50 m HgCl 2 was fully reversed by subsequent treatment with 10 mm 2-mercaptoethanol, suggesting that a toxic reaction was unlikely, as is also observed for roots of Allium cepa (Barrowclough et al, 2000) and A. deserti (North and Nobel, 2000). The 32% reduction of L P by 50 m HgCl 2 for roots of O. acanthocarpa under wet conditions is smaller than inhibitions using that concentration for A. cepa (57%-84% inhibition; Barrowclough et al, 2000), A. deserti (60%; North and Nobel, 2000), Capsicum annuum (66%; Carvajal et al, 1999), Cucumis melo (80%; Carvajal et al, 2000), barley (Hordeum vulgare; 90%; Tazawa et al, 1997), P. tremuloides (47%; Wan and Zwiazek, 1999), or bread wheat (66%; Carvajal et al, 1996). In any case, not all aquaporins are sensitive to mercury (Daniels et al, 1994;Otto and Kaldenhoff, 2000), and the penetration of HgCl 2 may by blocked by suberized cell layers (Barrowclough et al, 2000), such as the endodermis or periderm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies on whole root systems or root regions indicate that aquaporins can account for 60% to 80% of the root L P . HgCl 2 (100 m) decreases L P for the root system of Populus tremuloides in 1 h without reducing the respiration rate, suggesting that the inhibition of root water uptake is not due to metabolic inhibition (Wan and Zwiazek, 1999). In contrast, HgCl 2 rapidly depolarizes the plasma membrane (half-maximal depolarization at 8 m) for cortical root cells of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) and has other effects in addition to the direct inhibition of water channel activity (Zhang and Tyerman, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low soil temperature is often a major factor restricting the growth and yield of plants even if the soil is not frozen (Bonan, 1992;Wan and Zwiazek, 1999;Wan et al, 2001). In plants that are sensitive to cold soils, growth reduction is accompanied by the reduction of water uptake, which usually starts within a few minutes after the temperature decrease (Bigot and Boucaud, 1996;Lee et al, 2005a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to mercury-induced conformational changes and identification of conserved surface loops in plasma membrane aquaporins from higher plants, mercury is thought to bind to sulphydryl groups of the aquaporin proteins, physically blocking the channels and reducing their hydraulic conductivity [9]. Partial recovery of the water flow rate following the application of mercuric chloride was also observed in tomato and aspen root systems, implying the presence of aquaporins as the regulators of plant water status [84,85]. However, the inhibition of water flow with mercurial reagents is neither completely understood nor a general characteristic of aquaporins [28].…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Aquaporin To Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%