Mercury Control 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9783527658787.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury and Halogens in Coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of the bromide content based on chloride content was used in this project. The bromide‐to‐chloride mass ratio is relatively constant in different coal ranks at 0.02 Br/Cl (Kolker & Quick ). The bromide content of coal used for this study was calculated on the basis of the coal rank and chloride content using the 0.02 mg Br‐to‐Cl ratio.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of the bromide content based on chloride content was used in this project. The bromide‐to‐chloride mass ratio is relatively constant in different coal ranks at 0.02 Br/Cl (Kolker & Quick ). The bromide content of coal used for this study was calculated on the basis of the coal rank and chloride content using the 0.02 mg Br‐to‐Cl ratio.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a mass basis, bromine is typically 1-4 percent of the chlorine content of U.S. coals (Vosteen and others, 2010;Kolker and others, 2012). Halogen contents of U.S. coals vary with rank and are lowest in low-rank coals and anthracite (Kolker and Quick, 2015; appendix 2, slide 3.1-6). The mode of occurrence of halogens in coal was investigated by Huggins and Huffman (1995), using spectroscopic approaches, which showed that halogens in coal are associated with the organic fraction, indicating a predominant association where halogens present in coal moisture are loosely bound to maceral surfaces or retained in pore spaces.…”
Section: Mercury and Halogens In Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing EPA and USGS databases provide large data resources for characterizing U.S. coal (table 1). The contents of each of these databases are reviewed by Kolker and Quick (2015,…”
Section: What Sources Of Existing Data Are Available That Could Be Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mercury, current bulk analytical methods most widely used in coal analysis include thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, collectively known as direct mercury analysis (DMA; U.S. EPA, 2007), and cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAA; Aruscavage and Moore, 1989;O'Leary, 1997). For the USGS COALQUAL database, mercury data generated before 2005 were determined by CVAA and more recent results by DMA (Kolker and Quick, 2015). Other methods, such as cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), have been applied in specific cases, as discussed in Kolker and Quick (2015).…”
Section: What New Data Are Needed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation