1974
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.113.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury in human hair: A comparative study by using two different methods of atomic absorption and neutron activation analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Japanese living in France and Japanese in Japan, mercury levels were 2.3 ppm and 3.7 ppm, respectively (101). The inorganic mercury content ofJapanese on a Hawaiian Island was many times that of Japanese on other islands (48). Differences in the type of fish consumed was probably the cause.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Polluted Versus Unpolluted Areasmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Japanese living in France and Japanese in Japan, mercury levels were 2.3 ppm and 3.7 ppm, respectively (101). The inorganic mercury content ofJapanese on a Hawaiian Island was many times that of Japanese on other islands (48). Differences in the type of fish consumed was probably the cause.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Polluted Versus Unpolluted Areasmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A compilation of methods used to determine mercury in hair has been made (43). Dry vapor atomic absorption and neutron activation analysis have been used to compare values in replicate samples of hair with good correlation (48).…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Japanese living in France and Japanese in Japan, mercury levels were 2.3 ppm and 3.7 ppm, respectively (101). The inorganic mercury content of Japanese on a Hawaiian Island was many times that of Japanese on other islands (48). Differences in the type of fish consumed was probably the cause.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Polluted Versus Unpolluted Areasmentioning
confidence: 92%