2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury in some arc crustal rocks and mantle peridotites and relevance to the moderately volatile element budget of the Earth

Abstract: We measured Hg concentrations in 37 igneous rocks from an arc crustal section and in 30 mantle peridotites from ophiolite, orogenic massif and xenolith settings. Mercury is heterogeneously distributed in the igneous rocks and shows a 'nugget effect', suggesting it is concentrated in a trace phase, likely sulfide. The abundance of Hg in the crustal samples varies from 0.9-8 ppb and correlates with S and Cu but no other element indicative of differentiation. The average of our data produces 2.9±2.6 Hg for the bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Geogenic Hg from crustal rocks in U.S. typically exhibits more positive δ 202 Hg (~ −0.6 ± 0.5‰, 1SD) [ Smith et al ., ] and negligible MIF [ Blum et al ., ], and both are in contrast with the observed more negative δ 202 Hg (typically < −1‰) and significant MIF in our mineral soil samples. Mercury concentration in crustal rocks is still poorly defined, but a recent study on arc crustal rocks reported much lower Hg concentration (2.9 ± 2.6 ppb) [ Canil et al ., ] than most of our mineral soil samples. In addition, previous studies on Hg sources in soils using geochemical ratios also show that the dominant source of Hg in upper soils is from exogenic (i.e., atmospheric) inputs rather than from geogenic sources [ Grimaldi et al ., ; Fiorentino et al ., ; Peña‐Rodríguez et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Geogenic Hg from crustal rocks in U.S. typically exhibits more positive δ 202 Hg (~ −0.6 ± 0.5‰, 1SD) [ Smith et al ., ] and negligible MIF [ Blum et al ., ], and both are in contrast with the observed more negative δ 202 Hg (typically < −1‰) and significant MIF in our mineral soil samples. Mercury concentration in crustal rocks is still poorly defined, but a recent study on arc crustal rocks reported much lower Hg concentration (2.9 ± 2.6 ppb) [ Canil et al ., ] than most of our mineral soil samples. In addition, previous studies on Hg sources in soils using geochemical ratios also show that the dominant source of Hg in upper soils is from exogenic (i.e., atmospheric) inputs rather than from geogenic sources [ Grimaldi et al ., ; Fiorentino et al ., ; Peña‐Rodríguez et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2A). These concentrations at the low ng/g level are in the range of mafic-ultramafic rocks worldwide (i.e., 0.2-7.0 ng/g for basalts and peridotite) 12,13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This natural contribution is even smaller in some compartments of the terrestrial environment such are labile organic soils [62]. Recent findings suggest an order of magnitude lower crustal abundance of Hg than previously estimated [63]. However, using uniform basin-scale Hg yields we do not capture elevated inputs in areas more prone to erosion or areas naturally enriched in Hg such as Hg mineral belts and tectonically active areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%