“…By plotting Δ 202 Hg versus Δ 199 Hg signals, the three Hg sources are characterized by distinct “ δ 202 Hg‐Δ 199 Hg” signatures (Figure ). The isotopic signature of industrial Hg can be estimated using Hg polluted sediments with their locations in the vicinity of known industrial sources (Balogh et al, ; Bartov et al, ; Bonsignore et al, ; Cooke et al, ; Donovan et al, ; Guédron et al, ; Ma et al, ; Mil‐Homens et al, ; Gray et al, ; Perrot et al, ; Sonke et al, ; Wiederhold et al, ; Yin et al, ), and hydrothermal ores which are the major source of Hg used in industry (Blum & Bergquist, ; Cooke et al, ; Feng et al, ; Foucher & Hintelmann, ; Gray et al, ; Smith et al, ; Stetson et al, ; Wiederhold et al, ; Yin et al, ). Based on the summarization of previous data, we estimated that industrial Hg has mean δ 202 Hg of −0.53 ± 0.51‰ and mean Δ 199 Hg of −0.02 ± 0.11‰ (σ, n = 481).…”