1988
DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(88)90069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury porosimetry of coalsPore volume distribution and compressibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) comprises some unfilled pores (Friesen and Mikula, 1988;Li et al, 1999). For a compressible solid (Li et al, 1999):…”
Section: Mercury Porosimetry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) comprises some unfilled pores (Friesen and Mikula, 1988;Li et al, 1999). For a compressible solid (Li et al, 1999):…”
Section: Mercury Porosimetry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mercury intrusion data correction has not been carried out in the evaluation of PSDs related to TDCs, which would lead to an erroneous result for pore volume evaluation without compressibility correction. Furthermore, the compressibility of coal used to adjust the Hg pore volume is difficult to determine using the MIP method alone (Friesen and Mikula, 1988). N 2 adsorption is useful for characterizing porosity in the pore size range of 2-300 nm (Gan et al, 1972;Unsworth et al, 1989), and CO 2 adsorption works well for characterizing micro-porosity (b2 nm) (Liu and Wilcox, 2013;Mastalerz et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MIP is another standard method of determining the porosity and surface areas of coals, but is limited only to meso-and macro-porosity [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Although the application of the macroporosity of coals to most of its utilisation processes is still very limited, the understanding of this property is relevant in predicting total gas capacities of coals when used for CO 2 sequestration [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors [12][13][14][15] have concluded that mercury penetration in coal at pressures above 10 MPa is actually due to coal compressibility, which they calculate as a constant value. Others have argued that both pore intrusion and compression of coal occur above 10 MPa 16,17 . In this paper a modified method based on that developed by Zwietering and van Krevelen 12 and Toda and Toyoda 13 was applied.…”
Section: Densities and Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%